PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVY vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVY vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RDVY having a 11.06% return and QQQX slightly higher at 11.14%. Over the past 10 years, RDVY has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 15.65%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.


RDVY

1D
1.13%
1M
3.30%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.87%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
15.65%

QQQX

1D
-0.61%
1M
2.18%
YTD
11.14%
6M
14.21%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVY vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
11.06%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
11.14%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVY and QQQX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014

0.60

The correlation between RDVY and QQQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVY vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVY vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVYQQQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.61

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

16.87

-3.76

RDVY vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVY Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVY and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVYQQQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.24

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.63

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.48

+0.19

Drawdowns

RDVY vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVYQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-57.25%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.11%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-22.80%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-29.33%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

-35.96%

-4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.36%

+2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-8.02%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.95%

+0.19%

Volatility

RDVY vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is 4.01%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that RDVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVYQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.31%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

11.58%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

14.71%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

19.82%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

21.06%

+0.05%

RDVY vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDVY vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than QQQX's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.40%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.91%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVY and QQQX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to RDVY (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVY and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer