PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 11.39%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
16.75%
6M
14.41%
1Y
32.09%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
11.39%

XLY

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
16.75%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.16%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and XLY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.57

The correlation between RDIV and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
XLY

Financial Services

17.8%

-

Energy

17.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
97.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%

-

Communication Services

8.8%
1.4%

Real Estate

7.3%

-

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Technology

6.2%
0.9%

Utilities

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Financial Services

RDIV
17.8%
XLY

-

Energy

RDIV
17.3%
XLY

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
15.0%
XLY
97.5%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
14.6%
XLY

-

Communication Services

RDIV
8.8%
XLY
1.4%

Real Estate

RDIV
7.3%
XLY

-

Healthcare

RDIV
6.8%
XLY

-

Technology

RDIV
6.2%
XLY
0.9%

Utilities

RDIV
6.2%
XLY

-

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
XLY

-

Industrials

RDIV

-

XLY
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDIVXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.30

0.67

+5.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.74

2.05

+16.69

RDIV vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-59.05%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-14.98%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-26.01%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-39.67%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-39.67%

-10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.17%

+6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-9.55%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

4.88%

-3.24%

Volatility

RDIV vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.52%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

6.19%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

13.44%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

18.27%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

23.83%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

22.08%

-0.20%

RDIV vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.51%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and XLY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RDIV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs XLY's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.78% vs 11.39% for RDIV. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.13% for XLY.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer