PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. ONEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. ONEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than ONEY's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has underperformed ONEY with an annualized return of 11.30%, while ONEY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.60%
6M
17.44%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
11.74%

ONEY

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.22%
6M
12.45%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.01M$5.36M$5.13M
$3.34M$2.84M$4.35M

RDIV vs. ONEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
22.74%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
18.31%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and ONEY is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.82

The correlation between RDIV and ONEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDIV vs. ONEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
ONEY

Financial Services

19.2%
17.8%

Energy

17.0%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
11.1%

Communication Services

8.0%
3.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

6.8%
5.1%

Utilities

6.4%
10.8%

Technology

5.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

0.5%
5.5%

Industrials

-

9.8%

Financial Services

RDIV
19.2%
ONEY
17.8%

Energy

RDIV
17.0%
ONEY
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.4%
ONEY
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
14.5%
ONEY
11.1%

Communication Services

RDIV
8.0%
ONEY
3.2%

Real Estate

RDIV
7.6%
ONEY
11.2%

Healthcare

RDIV
6.8%
ONEY
5.1%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
ONEY
10.8%

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
ONEY
5.9%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
ONEY
5.5%

Industrials

RDIV

-

ONEY
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. ONEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDIV vs. ONEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDIVONEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.24

3.20

+4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.00

11.88

+10.12

RDIV vs. ONEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the ONEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and ONEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. ONEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than ONEY's maximum drawdown of -46.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and ONEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVONEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-46.80%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-7.61%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-17.50%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-18.93%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-46.80%

-3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.85%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-4.93%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.05%

-0.46%

Volatility

RDIV vs. ONEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 4.00%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVONEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.41%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

8.87%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

12.47%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

16.06%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

19.81%

+2.04%

RDIV vs. ONEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. ONEY - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than ONEY's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.77%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.45%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and ONEY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEY has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to RDIV (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs ONEY's -46.80%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.04% vs 11.30% for RDIV. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 2.77% for ONEY.

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.20% for ONEY.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and ONEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer