RBC vs. GS
RBC (RBC Bearings Incorporated) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. RBC operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RBC returned 22.75%/yr vs 22.78%/yr for GS. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RBC vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 17.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RBC having a 22.75% annualized return and GS not far ahead at 22.78%.
RBC
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 1Y
- 42.64%
- 3Y*
- 37.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.54%
GS
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 47.66%
- 3Y*
- 46.11%
- 5Y*
- 25.13%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08B | $2.12B | $2.27B | |
| $145.03M | $134.12M | $159.53M |
RBC vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated | 27.17% | 49.91% | 5.00% | 36.08% | 4.19% | 17.32% | 14.10% | 21.72% | 3.72% | 36.19% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 17.98% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBC and GS is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2005 | 0.46 |
The correlation between RBC and GS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RBC:
$18.04B
GS:
$302.99B
RBC:
$10.13
GS:
$67.36
RBC:
56.32
GS:
15.25
RBC:
0.79
GS:
1.97
RBC:
9.24
GS:
2.71
RBC:
5.22
GS:
1.88
RBC:
$1.95B
GS:
$117.94B
RBC:
$882.80M
GS:
$67.57B
RBC:
$554.90M
GS:
$31.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBC vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
RBC
GS
RBC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 2.47 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 7.55 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -78.84% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.20% | -19.42% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -30.90% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.26% | -32.84% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -48.75% | -6.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | -10.85% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -22.56% | +9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 6.33% | -1.11% |
Volatility
RBC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is 8.39%, while The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that RBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBC | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 14.40% | -6.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.68% | 26.03% | -4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 31.49% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.76% | 28.61% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 30.07% | +7.62% |
Dividends
RBC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.66% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 4.10% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RBC vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBC Bearings Incorporated and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBC vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
RBC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 247.80M and revenue of 519.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.7%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.24B and revenue of 38.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
RBC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 140.80M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.1%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.52B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
RBC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 101.50M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 6.63B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBC and GS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to RBC (8.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBC dropped -71.79% vs GS's -78.84%.
RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBC and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer