RBC vs. GS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).

Performance

RBC vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RBC vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated	21.12%	49.91%	5.00%	36.08%	4.19%	17.32%	14.10%	21.72%	3.72%	36.19%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	-3.25%	56.64%	52.03%	15.91%	-7.87%	47.61%	17.45%	40.48%	-33.53%	7.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBC : $17.19B GS : $268.69B
EPS RBC : $8.50 GS : $54.19
PE Ratio RBC : 63.89 GS : 15.61
PEG Ratio RBC : 1.22 GS : 2.02
PS Ratio RBC : 9.58 GS : 2.14
PB Ratio RBC : 5.27 GS : 2.15
Total Revenue (TTM) RBC : $1.79B GS : $125.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) RBC : $793.60M GS : $57.17B
EBITDA (TTM) RBC : $489.70M GS : $21.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 21.12% return, which is significantly higher than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RBC has outperformed GS with an annualized return of 22.87%, while GS has yielded a comparatively lower 20.59% annualized return.

RBC

• 1D: 3.57%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 21.12%
• 6M: 39.16%
• 1Y: 68.79%
• 3Y*: 32.64%
• 5Y*: 23.40%
• 10Y*: 22.87%

GS

• 1D: 4.75%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 40.67%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RBC vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBC

RBC Risk / Return Rank: 95
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GS

GS Risk / Return Rank: 87
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBC	GS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.82	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	2.35	+1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.33	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.46	3.04	+3.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.99	9.70	+7.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBC vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBC and GS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBC	GS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.82	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.87	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.70	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.31	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between RBC and GS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RBC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	4.10%	0.67%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	1.83%	1.59%	2.01%	2.72%	2.62%	1.70%	1.90%	1.80%	1.89%	1.14%	1.09%	1.41%

Drawdowns

RBC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and GS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBC	GS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.79%	-78.84%	+7.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.35%	-19.42%	+9.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.26%	-32.84%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.06%	-48.75%	-6.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-12.85%	+5.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-22.75%	+9.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	6.08%	-2.15%

Volatility

RBC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) have volatilities of 8.99% and 9.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBC	GS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.99%	9.44%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.89%	21.70%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.70%	32.11%	-5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.23%	27.68%	+3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.44%	29.71%	+7.73%

Financials

RBC vs. GS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RBC Bearings Incorporated and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 204.40M and revenue of 461.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 30.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

RBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 103.00M and revenue of 461.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.63B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

RBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 67.40M and revenue of 461.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.62B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.