PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBC vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 41.26% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RBC has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 25.14%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.94% annualized return.


RBC

1D
-1.90%
1M
13.12%
YTD
41.26%
6M
38.59%
1Y
66.15%
3Y*
44.71%
5Y*
26.49%
10Y*
25.14%

NVDA

1D
-4.13%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
7.39%
6M
5.85%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
68.08%
5Y*
59.90%
10Y*
67.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
41.26%49.91%5.00%36.08%4.19%17.32%14.10%21.72%3.72%36.19%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.39%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RBC and NVDA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2005

0.35

The correlation between RBC and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBC:

$20.09B

NVDA:

$4.88T

EPS

RBC:

$9.09

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

RBC:

69.65

NVDA:

30.65

PEG Ratio

RBC:

0.98

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

RBC:

10.71

NVDA:

19.30

PB Ratio

RBC:

5.98

NVDA:

24.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBC:

$1.87B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBC:

$830.20M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

RBC:

$510.20M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBC
RBC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBCNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.75

1.94

+3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

4.51

+11.01

RBC vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBC and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBCNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.79%

-89.72%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-20.21%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-36.88%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

-66.34%

+31.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

-66.34%

+11.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-15.04%

+13.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-36.16%

+23.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

8.66%

-4.38%

Volatility

RBC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is 8.79%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that RBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBCNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

13.29%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

26.92%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.39%

35.50%

-9.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.55%

51.84%

-20.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.65%

49.87%

-12.22%

Dividends

RBC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%4.10%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RBC vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBC Bearings Incorporated and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
518.00M
81.62B
(RBC) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RBC vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RBC Bearings Incorporated and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
48.5%
74.9%
Portfolio components
RBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 518.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

RBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 116.60M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

RBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 91.70M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to RBC (8.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBC dropped -71.79% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBC and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer