PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBC vs. NOVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBC vs. NOVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and Novanta Inc. (NOVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 30.27% return, which is significantly lower than NOVT's 40.30% return. Over the past 10 years, RBC has underperformed NOVT with an annualized return of 23.49%, while NOVT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.43% annualized return.


RBC

1D
1.01%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
30.27%
6M
33.33%
1Y
56.02%
3Y*
41.03%
5Y*
25.00%
10Y*
23.49%

NOVT

1D
-0.98%
1M
32.41%
YTD
40.30%
6M
46.08%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
-0.56%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
26.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBC vs. NOVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
30.27%49.91%5.00%36.08%4.19%17.32%14.10%21.72%3.72%36.19%
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
40.30%-22.11%-9.29%23.95%-22.95%49.15%33.67%40.38%26.00%138.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RBC and NOVT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.46

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBC:

$18.52B

NOVT:

$6.87B

EPS

RBC:

$9.09

NOVT:

$1.41

PE Ratio

RBC:

64.23

NOVT:

118.05

PEG Ratio

RBC:

0.91

NOVT:

32.92

PS Ratio

RBC:

9.87

NOVT:

6.31

PB Ratio

RBC:

5.51

NOVT:

5.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBC:

$1.87B

NOVT:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBC:

$830.20M

NOVT:

$444.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

RBC:

$510.20M

NOVT:

$150.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBC vs. NOVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBC
RBC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NOVT
NOVT Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NOVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBC vs. NOVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and Novanta Inc. (NOVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBCNOVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.16

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.87

1.22

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

2.56

+10.77

RBC vs. NOVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the NOVT Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBC and NOVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBCNOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

0.68

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.09

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.72

-0.20

Drawdowns

RBC vs. NOVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, which is greater than NOVT's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and NOVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBCNOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.79%

-46.71%

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-26.97%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-46.71%

+28.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

-46.71%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

-46.71%

-8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.26%

-10.34%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-12.28%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

12.85%

-8.63%

Volatility

RBC vs. NOVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is 11.23%, while Novanta Inc. (NOVT) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that RBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBCNOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.23%

16.19%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

32.92%

-13.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.59%

48.77%

-23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

40.00%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.61%

38.89%

-1.28%

Dividends

RBC vs. NOVT - Dividend Comparison

Neither RBC nor NOVT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
NOVT
Novanta Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%4.10%0.67%0.75%

Financials

RBC vs. NOVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBC Bearings Incorporated and Novanta Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
518.00M
257.71M
(RBC) Total Revenue
(NOVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RBC vs. NOVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RBC Bearings Incorporated and Novanta Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
48.5%
44.1%
Portfolio components
RBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 518.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

NOVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.58M and revenue of 257.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.1%.

RBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 116.60M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

NOVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported an operating income of 27.54M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

RBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 91.70M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

NOVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novanta Inc. reported a net income of 21.10M and revenue of 257.71M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBC and NOVT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOVT has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to RBC (11.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBC dropped -71.79% vs NOVT's -46.71%.

RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBC and NOVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer