GS vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GS or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between GS and XLF is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GS vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GS:
1.07
XLF:
1.20
GS:
1.69
XLF:
1.76
GS:
1.24
XLF:
1.26
GS:
1.23
XLF:
1.62
GS:
4.07
XLF:
6.15
GS:
9.33%
XLF:
4.09%
GS:
34.22%
XLF:
20.31%
GS:
-78.84%
XLF:
-82.43%
GS:
-7.45%
XLF:
-0.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 7.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GS having a 13.97% annualized return and XLF not far ahead at 14.42%.
GS
8.64%
21.50%
5.33%
35.27%
31.01%
13.97%
XLF
7.13%
10.59%
4.27%
23.31%
20.75%
14.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GS vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GS
XLF
GS vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GS vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than XLF's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.90% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.38% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
GS vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, roughly equal to the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
GS vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 5.16%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...