PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GS vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GS and BAC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

GS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
30.48%
9.78%
GS
BAC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GS:

2.63

BAC:

2.20

Sortino Ratio

GS:

3.67

BAC:

3.18

Omega Ratio

GS:

1.49

BAC:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

GS:

7.12

BAC:

1.55

Martin Ratio

GS:

23.54

BAC:

8.89

Ulcer Index

GS:

2.97%

BAC:

5.63%

Daily Std Dev

GS:

26.62%

BAC:

22.80%

Max Drawdown

GS:

-78.84%

BAC:

-93.45%

Current Drawdown

GS:

0.00%

BAC:

-2.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GS:

$196.49B

BAC:

$354.13B

EPS

GS:

$40.56

BAC:

$3.21

PE Ratio

GS:

15.43

BAC:

14.50

PEG Ratio

GS:

3.88

BAC:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$39.64B

BAC:

$76.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$39.64B

BAC:

$37.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$16.51B

BAC:

$38.91B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 15.85%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.18% annualized return.


GS

YTD

9.31%

1M

13.76%

6M

30.49%

1Y

70.09%

5Y*

23.24%

10Y*

15.85%

BAC

YTD

5.87%

1M

6.97%

6M

9.78%

1Y

50.38%

5Y*

8.73%

10Y*

14.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GS vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GS is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GS is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAC is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAC is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAC is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAC is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAC is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAC is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GS, currently valued at 2.63, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.632.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for GS, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.673.18
The chart of Omega ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.491.39
The chart of Calmar ratio for GS, currently valued at 7.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.121.55
The chart of Martin ratio for GS, currently valued at 23.54, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0023.548.89
GS
BAC

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and BAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.63
2.20
GS
BAC

Dividends

GS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than BAC's 2.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.84%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.15%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%

Drawdowns

GS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember20250
-2.05%
GS
BAC

Volatility

GS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 9.64% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 6.68%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.64%
6.68%
GS
BAC

Financials

GS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab