PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GS vs. BAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GSBAC
YTD Return22.10%17.51%
1Y Return46.40%42.38%
3Y Return (Ann)11.53%0.14%
5Y Return (Ann)21.78%9.39%
10Y Return (Ann)13.75%12.68%
Sharpe Ratio2.131.80
Daily Std Dev21.66%23.27%
Max Drawdown-78.84%-93.45%
Current Drawdown0.00%-15.45%

Fundamentals


GSBAC
Market Cap$146.63B$300.69B
EPS$25.65$2.90
PE Ratio17.7313.26
PEG Ratio3.143.69
Revenue (TTM)$46.73B$93.36B
Gross Profit (TTM)$37.53B$92.41B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between GS and BAC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 13.75%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
825.53%
113.62%
GS
BAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Bank of America Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GS, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GS, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GS, currently valued at 7.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.61
BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.80, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.67
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 5.12, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.12

GS vs. BAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which roughly equals the BAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GS and BAC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.13
1.80
GS
BAC

Dividends

GS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than BAC's 2.39% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.30%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%1.16%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.39%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%

Drawdowns

GS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
-15.45%
GS
BAC

Volatility

GS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is 4.74%, while Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that GS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.74%
5.17%
GS
BAC

Financials

GS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items