GS vs. BAC
Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GS or BAC.
Correlation
The correlation between GS and BAC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GS vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GS:
0.52
BAC:
-0.21
GS:
0.91
BAC:
-0.11
GS:
1.13
BAC:
0.98
GS:
0.55
BAC:
-0.21
GS:
2.54
BAC:
-0.83
GS:
6.38%
BAC:
7.11%
GS:
31.23%
BAC:
27.62%
GS:
-78.84%
BAC:
-93.45%
GS:
-29.61%
BAC:
-27.51%
Fundamentals
GS:
$146.32B
BAC:
$261.46B
GS:
$40.54
BAC:
$3.21
GS:
11.61
BAC:
10.71
GS:
5.62
BAC:
1.40
GS:
$39.30B
BAC:
$76.07B
GS:
$39.30B
BAC:
$50.94B
GS:
$14.93B
BAC:
$38.22B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a -17.37% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's -21.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed BAC with an annualized return of 11.59%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.
GS
-17.37%
-20.61%
-3.97%
18.45%
29.40%
11.59%
BAC
-21.26%
-18.17%
-13.24%
-4.55%
14.26%
10.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GS vs. BAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GS
BAC
GS vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GS vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than BAC's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 2.50% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.97% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
GS vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and BAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GS vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC) have volatilities of 15.46% and 15.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GS vs. BAC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Bank of America Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities