PortfoliosLab logo
GS vs. CL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GS and CL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

GS vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
834.83%
513.57%
GS
CL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GS:

0.51

CL:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

GS:

0.89

CL:

0.34

Omega Ratio

GS:

1.13

CL:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

GS:

0.51

CL:

0.15

Martin Ratio

GS:

2.27

CL:

0.28

Ulcer Index

GS:

6.94%

CL:

10.71%

Daily Std Dev

GS:

31.20%

CL:

19.39%

Max Drawdown

GS:

-78.84%

CL:

-58.91%

Current Drawdown

GS:

-30.90%

CL:

-17.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GS:

$144.68B

CL:

$72.34B

EPS

GS:

$40.54

CL:

$3.51

PE Ratio

GS:

11.48

CL:

25.41

PEG Ratio

GS:

5.22

CL:

1.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$39.30B

CL:

$15.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$39.30B

CL:

$9.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$14.93B

CL:

$3.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a -18.88% return, which is significantly lower than CL's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 11.20%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.87% annualized return.


GS

YTD

-18.88%

1M

-17.41%

6M

-5.99%

1Y

15.07%

5Y*

23.25%

10Y*

11.20%

CL

YTD

-1.99%

1M

-8.41%

6M

-10.97%

1Y

3.20%

5Y*

7.36%

10Y*

4.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GS vs. CL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GS is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GS is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GS is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GS is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GS is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GS vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GS, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
GS: 0.51
CL: 0.16
The chart of Sortino ratio for GS, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
GS: 0.89
CL: 0.34
The chart of Omega ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
GS: 1.13
CL: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for GS, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
GS: 0.51
CL: 0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for GS, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.00
GS: 2.27
CL: 0.28

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the CL Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and CL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.51
0.16
GS
CL

Dividends

GS vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than CL's 2.26% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.54%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.26%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%

Drawdowns

GS vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and CL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-30.90%
-17.67%
GS
CL

Volatility

GS vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 14.80% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.82%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.80%
8.82%
GS
CL

Financials

GS vs. CL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items