PortfoliosLab logo
GS vs. CL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GS and CL is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GS vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GS:

1.07

CL:

-0.07

Sortino Ratio

GS:

1.69

CL:

0.04

Omega Ratio

GS:

1.24

CL:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

GS:

1.23

CL:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

GS:

4.07

CL:

-0.12

Ulcer Index

GS:

9.33%

CL:

11.70%

Daily Std Dev

GS:

34.22%

CL:

20.48%

Max Drawdown

GS:

-78.84%

CL:

-58.90%

Current Drawdown

GS:

-7.45%

CL:

-14.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GS:

$188.98B

CL:

$72.64B

EPS

GS:

$43.36

CL:

$3.53

PE Ratio

GS:

14.20

CL:

25.39

PEG Ratio

GS:

6.90

CL:

1.90

PS Ratio

GS:

3.56

CL:

3.64

PB Ratio

GS:

1.72

CL:

195.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

GS:

$51.47B

CL:

$19.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GS:

$46.36B

CL:

$12.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

GS:

$18.47B

CL:

$4.82B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 13.95%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.


GS

YTD

8.64%

1M

24.04%

6M

5.33%

1Y

36.20%

5Y*

32.47%

10Y*

13.95%

CL

YTD

1.49%

1M

-1.87%

6M

-1.39%

1Y

-1.41%

5Y*

8.27%

10Y*

5.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GS vs. CL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GS is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GS is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GS is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GS is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GS is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GS is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GS vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the CL Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and CL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GS vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than CL's 2.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.90%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.21%2.18%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%

Drawdowns

GS vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and CL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GS vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 6.83%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GS vs. CL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
12.17B
4.91B
(GS) Total Revenue
(CL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GS vs. CL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
58.0%
60.8%
(GS) Gross Margin
(CL) Gross Margin
GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.06B and revenue of 12.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 2.99B and revenue of 4.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.8%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.04B and revenue of 12.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.74B and revenue of 12.17B, resulting in a net margin of 38.9%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 690.00M and revenue of 4.91B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.