GS vs. CL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL).

Performance

GS vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GS vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	-3.25%	56.64%	52.03%	15.91%	-7.87%	47.61%	17.45%	40.48%	-33.53%	7.73%
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	8.52%	-10.98%	16.57%	3.78%	-5.44%	2.08%	27.17%	18.60%	-19.19%	17.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GS : $268.69B CL : $68.58B
EPS GS : $54.19 CL : $2.63
PE Ratio GS : 15.61 CL : 32.41
PEG Ratio GS : 2.02 CL : 8.37
PS Ratio GS : 2.14 CL : 3.39
PB Ratio GS : 2.15 CL : 1.27K
Total Revenue (TTM) GS : $125.10B CL : $20.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) GS : $57.17B CL : $12.25B
EBITDA (TTM) GS : $21.81B CL : $3.77B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 20.59%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.

GS

• 1D: 4.75%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 40.67%
• 5Y*: 23.83%
• 10Y*: 20.59%

CL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -14.03%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: -6.80%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 4.08%
• 10Y*: 4.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GS vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GS

GS Risk / Return Rank: 87
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

CL

CL Risk / Return Rank: 29
CL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CL Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CL Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CL Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GS vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GS	CL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.32	+2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	-0.32	+2.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.96	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	-0.29	+3.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.70	-0.51	+10.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GS vs. CL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CL Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GS and CL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GS	CL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	-0.32	+2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.22	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.22	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.42	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between GS and CL is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GS vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than CL's 2.44% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.	1.83%	1.59%	2.01%	2.72%	2.62%	1.70%	1.90%	1.80%	1.89%	1.14%	1.09%	1.41%
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company	2.44%	2.61%	2.18%	2.40%	2.36%	2.10%	2.05%	2.48%	2.79%	2.11%	2.37%	2.25%

Drawdowns

GS vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and CL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GS	CL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.84%	-58.91%	-19.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.42%	-20.74%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.84%	-29.05%	-3.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.75%	-29.05%	-19.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.85%	-18.85%	+6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.75%	-11.22%	-11.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	11.69%	-5.61%

Volatility

GS vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 6.68%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GS	CL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.44%	6.68%	+2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.70%	15.89%	+5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.11%	21.34%	+10.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	18.30%	+9.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.71%	19.52%	+10.19%

Financials

GS vs. CL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 30.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

CL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.2%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.63B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.62B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.

CL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of -37.00M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.