PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBC vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RBC vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RBC has outperformed JPM with an annualized return of 23.36%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.77% annualized return.


RBC

1D
2.15%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
28.97%
6M
31.43%
1Y
56.22%
3Y*
40.56%
5Y*
24.83%
10Y*
23.36%

JPM

1D
1.48%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-5.70%
6M
-1.30%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
31.89%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBC vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
28.97%49.91%5.00%36.08%4.19%17.32%14.10%21.72%3.72%36.19%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-5.70%37.27%44.29%30.63%-12.64%27.75%-5.53%47.26%-6.62%26.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RBC and JPM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005

0.45

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RBC:

$18.34B

JPM:

$840.79B

EPS

RBC:

$9.09

JPM:

$21.08

PE Ratio

RBC:

63.59

JPM:

14.28

PEG Ratio

RBC:

0.90

JPM:

1.58

PS Ratio

RBC:

9.78

JPM:

2.95

PB Ratio

RBC:

5.46

JPM:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

RBC:

$1.87B

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RBC:

$830.20M

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

RBC:

$510.20M

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBC vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBC
RBC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBC vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBCJPMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.21

0.75

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

1.10

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.14

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

1.05

+3.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.84

2.52

+11.31

RBC vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBC Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBC and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBCJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

0.75

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.64

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.72

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.17

Drawdowns

RBC vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, smaller than the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBCJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.79%

-76.16%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-15.47%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-24.42%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

-38.77%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

-43.63%

-11.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-9.60%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-17.63%

+4.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

6.43%

-2.23%

Volatility

RBC vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.55%. This indicates that RBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBCJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.18%

6.55%

+4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.72%

17.21%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

21.41%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

24.41%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.62%

27.38%

+10.24%

Dividends

RBC vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.96%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
RBC
RBC Bearings Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%4.10%0.67%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RBC vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBC Bearings Incorporated and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
518.00M
73.66B
(RBC) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RBC vs. JPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RBC Bearings Incorporated and JPMorgan Chase & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.5%
64.3%
Portfolio components
RBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 251.00M and revenue of 518.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

JPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a gross profit of 47.33B and revenue of 73.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.3%.

RBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 116.60M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

JPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported an operating income of 20.48B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

RBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 91.70M and revenue of 518.00M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

JPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a net income of 16.49B and revenue of 73.66B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBC and JPM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBC has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to JPM (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBC dropped -71.79% vs JPM's -76.16%.

RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBC and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer