RBC vs. LECO
RBC (RBC Bearings Incorporated) and LECO (Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Tools & Accessories industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, RBC returned 22.75%/yr vs 17.61%/yr for LECO. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
RBC vs. LECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBC achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than LECO's 12.45% return. Over the past 10 years, RBC has outperformed LECO with an annualized return of 22.75%, while LECO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.61% annualized return.
RBC
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 27.17%
- 1Y
- 42.64%
- 3Y*
- 37.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.54%
LECO
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 17.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $132.98M | $98.63M | $95.74M | |
| $145.03M | $134.12M | $159.53M |
RBC vs. LECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated | 27.17% | 49.91% | 5.00% | 36.08% | 4.19% | 17.32% | 14.10% | 21.72% | 3.72% | 36.19% |
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | 12.45% | 29.63% | -12.55% | 52.61% | 5.42% | 21.89% | 22.97% | 25.41% | -12.24% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBC and LECO is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2005 | 0.57 |
The correlation between RBC and LECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RBC:
$18.04B
LECO:
$14.60B
RBC:
$10.13
LECO:
$10.00
RBC:
56.32
LECO:
26.78
RBC:
0.79
LECO:
1.16
RBC:
9.24
LECO:
3.31
RBC:
5.22
LECO:
9.49
RBC:
$1.95B
LECO:
$4.48B
RBC:
$882.80M
LECO:
$1.61B
RBC:
$554.90M
LECO:
$887.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBC vs. LECO — Risk / Return Rank
RBC
LECO
RBC vs. LECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.62 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 1.39 | +6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBC vs. LECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBC drawdown since its inception was -71.79%, roughly equal to the maximum LECO drawdown of -68.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBC and LECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.79% | -68.89% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.20% | -20.09% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -34.29% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.26% | -34.29% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.06% | -38.89% | -16.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | -9.84% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -13.50% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 9.01% | -3.79% |
Volatility
RBC vs. LECO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is 8.39%, while Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that RBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBC | LECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 10.97% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.68% | 21.99% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 27.68% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.76% | 27.07% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.69% | 27.62% | +10.07% |
Dividends
RBC vs. LECO - Dividend Comparison
RBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.21% | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.57% | 1.71% | 2.29% |
RBC RBC Bearings Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 4.10% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RBC vs. LECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RBC Bearings Incorporated and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBC vs. LECO - Profitability Comparison
RBC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a gross profit of 247.80M and revenue of 519.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.7%.
LECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 449.00M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
RBC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported an operating income of 140.80M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.1%.
LECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 224.13M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
RBC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RBC Bearings Incorporated reported a net income of 101.50M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
LECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 158.52M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBC and LECO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LECO has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to RBC (8.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBC dropped -71.79% vs LECO's -68.89%.
RBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBC and LECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer