PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RARE vs. BTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RARE vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RARE achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -18.35% return.


RARE

1D
5.79%
1M
24.11%
YTD
26.22%
6M
-16.46%
1Y
-21.84%
3Y*
-16.69%
5Y*
-20.90%
10Y*
-5.13%

BTU

1D
-2.74%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-18.35%
6M
-21.01%
1Y
81.90%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
25.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RARE vs. BTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
26.22%-45.33%-12.02%3.22%-44.90%-39.25%224.12%-1.77%-6.25%-31.57%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
-18.35%44.18%-12.80%-7.03%162.36%317.84%-73.57%-67.32%-21.62%31.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RARE and BTU is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017

0.09

The correlation between RARE and BTU shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RARE:

-$6.11

BTU:

-$0.44

PS Ratio

RARE:

4.32

BTU:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

RARE:

$669.43M

BTU:

$3.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RARE:

$559.44M

BTU:

$318.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

RARE:

-$522.35M

BTU:

$401.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RARE vs. BTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RARE
RARE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RARE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RARE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
BTU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RARE vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAREBTUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.23

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

2.02

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

4.53

-5.16

RARE vs. BTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RARE Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RARE and BTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RARE vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RARE drawdown since its inception was -89.57%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RARE and BTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAREBTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.57%

-98.07%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.36%

-40.67%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.83%

-65.14%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.93%

-67.44%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.63%

-41.58%

-42.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.86%

-48.04%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.00%

18.12%

+16.88%

Volatility

RARE vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE) is 16.92%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that RARE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAREBTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.92%

22.35%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.41%

42.09%

+26.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.37%

60.65%

+10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.28%

66.28%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.34%

77.73%

-22.39%

Dividends

RARE vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

RARE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.24%1.01%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RARE vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
136.00M
1.02B
(RARE) Total Revenue
(BTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RARE and BTU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTU has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to RARE (16.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RARE dropped -89.57% vs BTU's -98.07%.

BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RARE and BTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer