BTU vs. EPAM

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than EPAM's -2.03% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is comparable to the EPAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and EPAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, which is greater than EPAM's maximum drawdown of -76.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and EPAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) at 6.59%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and EPAM Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.