BTU vs. EPAM
Compare and contrast key facts about Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTU or EPAM.
Key characteristics
| BTU | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.87% | -16.36% |
| 1Y Return | 21.94% | 0.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 34.69% | -28.24% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.36% | 3.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.63 | 0.14 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 0.47 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.08 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.43 | 0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.84 | 0.21 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.96% | 28.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.92% | 43.76% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.08% | -76.27% |
| Current Drawdown | -34.67% | -65.34% |
Fundamentals
| BTU | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $13.94B |
| EPS | $3.79 | $7.71 |
| PE Ratio | 7.07 | 31.87 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.27B | $4.64B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $566.90M | $1.36B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $866.30M | $644.96M |
Correlation
The correlation between BTU and EPAM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BTU vs. EPAM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly higher than EPAM's -16.36% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BTU vs. EPAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BTU vs. EPAM - Dividend Comparison
BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% |
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BTU vs. EPAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.08%, which is greater than EPAM's maximum drawdown of -76.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and EPAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BTU vs. EPAM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is 14.25%, while EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that BTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BTU vs. EPAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and EPAM Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities