BTU vs. XELA
BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) and XELA (Exela Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. BTU operates in Thermal Coal (Energy), while XELA operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BTU returned 24.56%/yr vs -92.69%/yr for XELA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTU vs. XELA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTU
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -17.94%
- 6M
- -21.91%
- 1Y
- 83.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 24.56%
- 10Y*
- —
XELA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 587.50%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -63.33%
- 1Y
- -0.90%
- 3Y*
- -86.82%
- 5Y*
- -92.69%
- 10Y*
- -80.20%
BTU vs. XELA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | -17.94% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 31.10% |
XELA Exela Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | -99.01% | -66.96% | -79.51% | -99.53% | -29.58% | 1.79% | -89.51% | -24.47% | -48.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTU and XELA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
BTU:
$3.86B
XELA:
-$284.40M
BTU:
$318.50M
XELA:
-$43.97M
BTU:
$401.20M
XELA:
-$20.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTU vs. XELA — Risk / Return Rank
BTU
XELA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTU vs. XELA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Exela Technologies, Inc. (XELA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTU | XELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -34.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 6.69 | -5.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.01 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | -0.01 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTU vs. XELA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, roughly equal to the maximum XELA drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and XELA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTU | XELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.07% | -100.00% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.67% | -99.59% | +58.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.14% | -99.98% | +34.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.44% | -100.00% | +32.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.29% | -100.00% | +58.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.04% | -70.76% | +22.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.28% | 89.91% | -71.63% |
Volatility
BTU vs. XELA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) is 21.90%, while Exela Technologies, Inc. (XELA) has a volatility of 498.36%. This indicates that BTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XELA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTU | XELA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.90% | 498.36% | -476.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.72% | 875.59% | -833.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.53% | 5,899.25% | -5,838.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.24% | 2,562.20% | -2,495.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.71% | 1,805.34% | -1,727.63% |
Dividends
BTU vs. XELA - Dividend Comparison
BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while XELA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.24% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% |
XELA Exela Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BTU vs. XELA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Exela Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BTU vs. XELA - Profitability Comparison
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 49.70M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.9%.
XELA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 11.21M and revenue of 39.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 19.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
XELA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 806.00K and revenue of 39.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
XELA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exela Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -6.89M and revenue of 39.62M, resulting in a net margin of -17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTU and XELA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XELA has higher volatility (498.36%) compared to BTU (21.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTU dropped -98.07% vs XELA's -100.00%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTU and XELA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer