PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTU vs. AR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BTU and AR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

BTU vs. AR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Antero Resources Corporation (AR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.23%
-4.96%
BTU
AR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTU:

-0.27

AR:

0.96

Sortino Ratio

BTU:

-0.16

AR:

1.61

Omega Ratio

BTU:

0.98

AR:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

BTU:

-0.19

AR:

0.55

Martin Ratio

BTU:

-0.72

AR:

2.67

Ulcer Index

BTU:

13.56%

AR:

13.89%

Daily Std Dev

BTU:

36.21%

AR:

38.64%

Max Drawdown

BTU:

-98.07%

AR:

-98.97%

Current Drawdown

BTU:

-48.93%

AR:

-52.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTU:

$2.60B

AR:

$9.83B

EPS

BTU:

$3.79

AR:

$0.14

PE Ratio

BTU:

5.66

AR:

225.64

PEG Ratio

BTU:

0.00

AR:

1.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTU:

$4.27B

AR:

$4.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTU:

$566.90M

AR:

$1.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

BTU:

$1.11B

AR:

$936.46M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a -10.26% return, which is significantly lower than AR's 36.07% return.


BTU

YTD

-10.26%

1M

-18.83%

6M

-4.23%

1Y

-8.88%

5Y*

19.56%

10Y*

N/A

AR

YTD

36.07%

1M

-3.32%

6M

-4.96%

1Y

42.15%

5Y*

62.37%

10Y*

-2.82%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTU vs. AR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Antero Resources Corporation (AR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.270.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.161.61
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.20
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.190.66
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.722.67
BTU
AR

The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the AR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and AR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.27
0.96
BTU
AR

Dividends

BTU vs. AR - Dividend Comparison

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while AR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.39%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AR
Antero Resources Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.58%0.99%2.20%

Drawdowns

BTU vs. AR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, roughly equal to the maximum AR drawdown of -98.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and AR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-48.93%
-36.12%
BTU
AR

Volatility

BTU vs. AR - Volatility Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to Antero Resources Corporation (AR) at 9.90%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.63%
9.90%
BTU
AR

Financials

BTU vs. AR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Antero Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab