PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTU vs. ZWS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BTU and ZWS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

BTU vs. ZWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-15.68%
23.93%
BTU
ZWS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTU:

-0.43

ZWS:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

BTU:

-0.42

ZWS:

2.12

Omega Ratio

BTU:

0.95

ZWS:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

BTU:

-0.28

ZWS:

0.67

Martin Ratio

BTU:

-0.98

ZWS:

6.41

Ulcer Index

BTU:

16.28%

ZWS:

5.76%

Daily Std Dev

BTU:

37.26%

ZWS:

25.38%

Max Drawdown

BTU:

-98.07%

ZWS:

-69.31%

Current Drawdown

BTU:

-54.26%

ZWS:

-39.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTU:

$2.34B

ZWS:

$6.37B

EPS

BTU:

$3.87

ZWS:

$0.78

PE Ratio

BTU:

4.99

ZWS:

48.10

PEG Ratio

BTU:

0.00

ZWS:

1.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTU:

$3.04B

ZWS:

$1.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTU:

$291.10M

ZWS:

$516.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTU:

$736.70M

ZWS:

$175.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than ZWS's 2.36% return.


BTU

YTD

-7.83%

1M

-10.44%

6M

-15.68%

1Y

-25.05%

5Y*

18.21%

10Y*

N/A

ZWS

YTD

2.36%

1M

2.41%

6M

23.92%

1Y

35.29%

5Y*

3.56%

10Y*

12.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTU vs. ZWS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZWS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZWS is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZWS is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZWS is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZWS is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZWS is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTU vs. ZWS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.431.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.422.12
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.951.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.280.67
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.98, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.986.41
BTU
ZWS

The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the ZWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and ZWS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.43
1.46
BTU
ZWS

Dividends

BTU vs. ZWS - Dividend Comparison

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than ZWS's 0.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.55%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%
ZWS
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation
0.86%0.88%0.99%0.95%0.44%0.60%0.00%0.00%41.74%

Drawdowns

BTU vs. ZWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, which is greater than ZWS's maximum drawdown of -69.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and ZWS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-54.26%
-39.72%
BTU
ZWS

Volatility

BTU vs. ZWS - Volatility Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to Zurn Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) at 6.75%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
11.96%
6.75%
BTU
ZWS

Financials

BTU vs. ZWS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Zurn Water Solutions Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab