PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTU vs. GMKN.ME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BTUGMKN.ME
YTD Return17.24%-30.30%
1Y Return25.66%-35.19%
3Y Return (Ann)35.78%-20.22%
5Y Return (Ann)24.40%-7.43%
Sharpe Ratio0.75-0.00
Sortino Ratio1.3396.63
Omega Ratio1.1537.21
Calmar Ratio0.51-0.34
Martin Ratio2.19-0.44
Ulcer Index11.92%77.71%
Daily Std Dev34.66%9,842.67%
Max Drawdown-98.08%-99.37%
Current Drawdown-33.32%-99.25%

Fundamentals


BTUGMKN.ME
Market Cap$3.43BRUB 2.61T
EPS$3.79RUB 604.76
PE Ratio7.456.36
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.27BRUB 3.62B
Gross Profit (TTM)$566.90MRUB 2.11B
EBITDA (TTM)$866.30MRUB 1.70B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between BTU and GMKN.ME is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than GMKN.ME's -30.30% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
27.40%
-29.35%
BTU
GMKN.ME

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel (GMKN.ME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.56
GMKN.ME
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.00
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at 95.78, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.0095.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at 33.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.0033.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GMKN.ME, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.49

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the GMKN.ME Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and GMKN.ME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.80JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.56
-0.00
BTU
GMKN.ME

Dividends

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Dividend Comparison

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than GMKN.ME's 599.33% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
0.80%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GMKN.ME
Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel
599.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.98%11.94%10.61%6.18%6.66%14.18%12.51%4.09%

Drawdowns

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GMKN.ME drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and GMKN.ME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-33.32%
-99.28%
BTU
GMKN.ME

Volatility

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Volatility Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 13.93% compared to Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel (GMKN.ME) at 12.94%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMKN.ME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.93%
12.94%
BTU
GMKN.ME

Financials

BTU vs. GMKN.ME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. BTU values in USD, GMKN.ME values in RUB