PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BTU vs. ARLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BTUARLP
YTD Return14.87%41.61%
1Y Return21.94%33.90%
3Y Return (Ann)34.69%50.32%
5Y Return (Ann)24.36%26.86%
Sharpe Ratio0.631.43
Sortino Ratio1.161.96
Omega Ratio1.131.26
Calmar Ratio0.431.71
Martin Ratio1.845.76
Ulcer Index11.96%6.18%
Daily Std Dev34.92%24.84%
Max Drawdown-98.08%-90.52%
Current Drawdown-34.67%-1.04%

Fundamentals


BTUARLP
Market Cap$3.26B$3.28B
EPS$3.79$3.52
PE Ratio7.077.28
PEG Ratio0.00-1.04
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.27B$2.48B
Gross Profit (TTM)$566.90M$576.84M
EBITDA (TTM)$866.30M$767.36M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BTU and ARLP is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BTU vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 41.61% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.06%
23.40%
BTU
ARLP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTU vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.84
ARLP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.88
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.63
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARLP, currently valued at 5.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.80

BTU vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and ARLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63
1.37
BTU
ARLP

Dividends

BTU vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than ARLP's 10.52% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.08%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.52%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.55%8.86%19.74%5.75%5.93%

Drawdowns

BTU vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.08%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and ARLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-34.67%
-1.04%
BTU
ARLP

Volatility

BTU vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 14.25% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 7.70%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.25%
7.70%
BTU
ARLP

Financials

BTU vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items