BTU vs. ARLP
BTU (Peabody Energy Corporation) and ARLP (Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Thermal Coal industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, BTU returned 13.74%/yr vs 40.15%/yr for ARLP. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BTU vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a -27.83% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 17.26% return.
BTU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- YTD
- -27.83%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.10%
ARLP
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.62%
- 5Y*
- 40.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.60M | $5.99M | $7.50M | |
| $64.45M | $57.10M | $82.42M |
BTU vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | -27.83% | 44.18% | -12.80% | -7.03% | 162.36% | 317.84% | -73.57% | -67.32% | -21.62% | 31.10% |
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 17.26% | -2.45% | 39.91% | 18.83% | 73.34% | 195.75% | -56.80% | -28.90% | -1.90% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTU and ARLP is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.46 |
The correlation between BTU and ARLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BTU:
$2.60B
ARLP:
$3.34B
BTU:
-$0.98
ARLP:
$2.07
BTU:
0.66
ARLP:
1.53
BTU:
$3.90B
ARLP:
$2.17B
BTU:
$260.30M
ARLP:
$613.22M
BTU:
$333.20M
ARLP:
$650.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTU vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank
BTU
ARLP
BTU vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTU | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 0.47 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 0.91 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTU vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and ARLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTU | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.07% | -90.52% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.12% | -16.92% | -30.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.14% | -20.83% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.44% | -29.13% | -38.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -85.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.36% | -8.33% | -40.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.00% | -24.27% | -23.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.79% | 8.61% | +14.18% |
Volatility
BTU vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison
Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 5.29%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTU | ARLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 5.29% | +9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.93% | 16.91% | +25.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.35% | 22.98% | +35.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.02% | 32.69% | +30.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.42% | 49.67% | +27.75% |
Dividends
BTU vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison
BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than ARLP's 9.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 9.25% | 11.19% | 10.65% | 13.22% | 7.38% | 3.16% | 8.93% | 19.82% | 11.94% | 9.54% | 8.85% | 19.74% |
BTU Peabody Energy Corporation | 1.41% | 1.01% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.43% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BTU vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BTU vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison
BTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 108.60M and revenue of 973.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.
ARLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 202.70M and revenue of 551.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of -46.10M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.7%.
ARLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 95.59M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
BTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of -32.40M and revenue of 973.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.
ARLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 79.56M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BTU and ARLP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTU has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to ARLP (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTU dropped -98.07% vs ARLP's -90.52%.
BTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTU and ARLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer