PortfoliosLab logo
BTU vs. ARLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BTU and ARLP is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BTU vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BTU:

-0.66

ARLP:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

BTU:

-0.75

ARLP:

1.64

Omega Ratio

BTU:

0.91

ARLP:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

BTU:

-0.44

ARLP:

2.24

Martin Ratio

BTU:

-1.03

ARLP:

5.34

Ulcer Index

BTU:

32.34%

ARLP:

5.95%

Daily Std Dev

BTU:

51.63%

ARLP:

26.73%

Max Drawdown

BTU:

-98.07%

ARLP:

-90.52%

Current Drawdown

BTU:

-64.79%

ARLP:

-3.92%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTU:

$1.79B

ARLP:

$3.43B

EPS

BTU:

$2.70

ARLP:

$2.13

PE Ratio

BTU:

5.45

ARLP:

12.53

PEG Ratio

BTU:

0.00

ARLP:

-1.04

PS Ratio

BTU:

0.43

ARLP:

1.47

PB Ratio

BTU:

0.49

ARLP:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTU:

$4.19B

ARLP:

$2.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTU:

$715.60M

ARLP:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

BTU:

$902.70M

ARLP:

$138.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTU achieves a -29.06% return, which is significantly lower than ARLP's 6.86% return.


BTU

YTD

-29.06%

1M

15.15%

6M

-44.44%

1Y

-33.65%

5Y*

37.16%

10Y*

N/A

ARLP

YTD

6.86%

1M

0.81%

6M

4.86%

1Y

30.22%

5Y*

68.56%

10Y*

8.58%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BTU vs. ARLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARLP is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARLP is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARLP is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BTU vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTU and ARLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BTU vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than ARLP's 10.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.04%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
10.49%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.55%8.86%19.74%5.75%

Drawdowns

BTU vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTU drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, which is greater than ARLP's maximum drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTU and ARLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BTU vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 7.60%. This indicates that BTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BTU vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Peabody Energy Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
937.00M
540.47M
(BTU) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BTU vs. ARLP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Peabody Energy Corporation and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
17.8%
100.0%
(BTU) Gross Margin
(ARLP) Gross Margin
BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.80M and revenue of 937.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

ARLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 540.47M and revenue of 540.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 31.90M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

ARLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 94.28M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 38.30M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

ARLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 73.98M and revenue of 540.47M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.