QVML vs. OMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QVML (Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVML is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVML returned 22.47%/yr vs 14.35%/yr for OMFL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QVML charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for OMFL.

Performance

QVML vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 12.39% return.

QVML

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 11.48%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMFL

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVML vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	11.17%	17.74%	25.87%	22.19%	-16.25%	12.56%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	12.39%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and OMFL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.89

The correlation between QVML and OMFL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVML vs. OMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVML	OMFL
Technology	35.5%	31.0%
Financial Services	12.8%	11.5%
Communication Services	11.9%	11.7%
Healthcare	8.7%	10.4%
Industrials	8.7%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	8.8%
Energy	3.6%	3.7%
Utilities	2.5%	0.4%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.8%

Return for Risk

QVML vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML

QVML Risk / Return Rank: 71
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 77

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 57
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVML	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	1.84	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	2.57	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	2.91	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.85	13.12	+1.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVML vs. OMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and OMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVML	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	1.84	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.70	+0.14

Drawdowns

QVML vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum OMFL drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and OMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVML	OMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.52%	-33.24%	+9.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-7.58%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.71%	-15.52%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.19%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.40%	-4.80%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.68%	+0.18%

Volatility

QVML vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 2.40%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVML	OMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	2.40%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	9.45%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.69%	12.03%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	16.75%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	20.11%	-3.52%

QVML vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVML vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than OMFL's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.75%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF	0.99%	1.10%	1.15%	1.43%	1.72%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVML and OMFL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, QVML and OMFL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QVML or OMFL?

QVML has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVML dropped -23.52% vs OMFL's -33.24%.

Which ETF is better, QVML or OMFL?

On 3-year performance, QVML leads with 22.47% vs 14.35% for OMFL. On fees, QVML is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVML or OMFL?

Over the 3-year period, QVML has performed better with a 22.47% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVML or OMFL?

QVML is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVML or OMFL?

QVML has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between QVML and OMFL?

QVML is categorized as Multi-factor, while OMFL is Large Cap Blend Equities. QVML tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for QVML and 0.29% for OMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.