OMFL vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while WTV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. OMFL is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 8.89%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

OMFL vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OMFL having a 10.40% return and WTV slightly lower at 10.06%.

OMFL

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -1.15%
• YTD: 10.40%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 8.89%
• 10Y*: —

WTV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFL vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	10.40%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	28.95%	20.91%	35.58%	-2.55%	0.98%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	10.06%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-8.29%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFL and WTV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017	0.83

The correlation between OMFL and WTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OMFL vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMFL	WTV
Technology	34.5%	18.3%
Communication Services	11.2%	6.5%
Financial Services	11.0%	18.5%
Healthcare	9.9%	7.5%
Industrials	9.2%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	9.9%
Energy	3.3%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.8%	5.4%
Utilities	0.3%	4.5%

Return for Risk

OMFL vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFL vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMFL	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.89	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.75	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.34	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	3.14	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	10.16	+1.90

OMFL vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFL and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMFL vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFL	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.24%	-42.18%	+8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.58%	-7.15%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-18.49%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.44%	-19.30%	-3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.57%	-1.54%	-1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-5.03%	+0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	2.20%	-0.49%

Volatility

OMFL vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that OMFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFL	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.65%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	8.20%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.54%	11.90%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.81%	17.08%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.09%	20.16%	-0.07%

OMFL vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFL vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than WTV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.83%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFL and WTV in my portfolio?

OMFL and WTV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMFL or WTV?

OMFL has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to WTV (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs WTV's -42.18%.

Which ETF is better, OMFL or WTV?

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.43% vs 8.89% for OMFL. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFL or WTV?

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFL or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFL or WTV?

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.83% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between OMFL and WTV?

OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WTV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.12% for WTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.