OMFL vs. RWL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL).
OMFL and RWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. RWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both OMFL and RWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMFL or RWL.
Performance
OMFL vs. RWL - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than RWL's 22.16% return.
OMFL
7.75%
2.93%
2.81%
16.42%
12.84%
N/A
RWL
22.16%
4.90%
12.97%
29.24%
14.49%
11.73%
Key characteristics
| OMFL | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.16 | 2.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.62 | 3.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.23 | 4.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.63 | 17.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.52% | 1.68% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.14% | 10.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.24% | -54.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.35% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OMFL vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and RWL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMFL vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OMFL vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than RWL's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.38% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 1.61% | 1.71% | 1.97% | 1.43% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and RWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OMFL vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.