OMFL vs. OMFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS).
OMFL and OMFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. OMFS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both OMFL and OMFS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
OMFL vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OMFL vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | -1.41% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 28.95% | 20.91% | 35.58% | -2.55% | 4.95% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 2.13% | 13.34% | 3.98% | 15.12% | -17.29% | 28.60% | 15.02% | 27.12% | -9.01% | 3.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a -1.41% return, which is significantly lower than OMFS's 2.13% return.
OMFL
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
OMFS
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 20.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OMFL vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OMFL vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank
OMFL
OMFS
OMFL vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMFL | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.96 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.80 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 6.67 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMFL | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.96 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.18 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.36 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and OMFS is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OMFL vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than OMFS's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.86% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.02% | 0.80% | 1.87% | 1.27% | 1.84% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and OMFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFL | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -42.50% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -12.23% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -29.22% | +6.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -6.39% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -10.68% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.29% | -1.18% |
Volatility
OMFL vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 5.24%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OMFL | OMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 6.48% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 13.57% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 21.35% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 21.61% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 24.45% | -4.19% |