PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTWO vs. GDOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QTWO vs. GDOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Green Dot Corporation (GDOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a -37.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDOT's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has outperformed GDOT with an annualized return of 5.15%, while GDOT has yielded a comparatively lower -5.43% annualized return.


QTWO

1D
-1.95%
1M
-10.59%
YTD
-37.89%
6M
-39.02%
1Y
-50.89%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
-13.94%
10Y*
5.15%

GDOT

1D
0.71%
1M
1.03%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
-12.68%
5Y*
-21.98%
10Y*
-5.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTWO vs. GDOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
-37.89%-28.31%131.86%61.56%-66.18%-37.22%56.06%63.63%34.46%27.73%
GDOT
Green Dot Corporation
-0.47%20.39%7.47%-37.42%-56.35%-35.05%139.48%-70.70%31.96%155.88%

Correlation

The correlation between QTWO and GDOT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.39

The correlation between QTWO and GDOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QTWO:

$3.03B

GDOT:

$739.70M

EPS

QTWO:

$1.07

GDOT:

-$1.27

PS Ratio

QTWO:

3.76

GDOT:

0.33

PB Ratio

QTWO:

4.96

GDOT:

0.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

QTWO:

$821.58M

GDOT:

$2.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QTWO:

$456.61M

GDOT:

$323.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

QTWO:

$105.55M

GDOT:

$130.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTWO vs. GDOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTWO
QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GDOT
GDOT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GDOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTWO vs. GDOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Green Dot Corporation (GDOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTWOGDOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.20

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

1.07

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

1.91

-3.42

QTWO vs. GDOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the GDOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and GDOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTWOGDOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.16

0.68

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.43

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

-0.10

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.14

+0.35

Drawdowns

QTWO vs. GDOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, smaller than the maximum GDOT drawdown of -93.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and GDOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTWOGDOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.77%

-93.17%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.08%

-30.95%

-22.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.68%

-69.62%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.69%

-88.43%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.77%

-93.17%

+7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.45%

-86.27%

+16.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.20%

-60.24%

+30.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.84%

17.37%

+16.47%

Volatility

QTWO vs. GDOT - Volatility Comparison

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 18.44% compared to Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) at 5.85%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTWOGDOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.44%

5.85%

+12.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.97%

17.45%

+15.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.22%

49.13%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.12%

50.96%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.29%

52.34%

-8.05%

Dividends

QTWO vs. GDOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTWO nor GDOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QTWO vs. GDOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Green Dot Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
216.51M
656.25M
(QTWO) Total Revenue
(GDOT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QTWO vs. GDOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Green Dot Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.1%
0
Portfolio components
QTWO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.91M and revenue of 216.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

GDOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 656.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

QTWO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.69M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

GDOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 656.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

QTWO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 26.64M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

GDOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported a net income of 53.75M and revenue of 656.25M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTWO and GDOT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTWO has higher volatility (18.44%) compared to GDOT (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTWO dropped -85.77% vs GDOT's -93.17%.

GDOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTWO and GDOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer