PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDOT vs. FLYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GDOT vs. FLYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDOT achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLYW's 10.24% return.


GDOT

1D
2.17%
1M
3.29%
YTD
3.04%
6M
1.38%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
-10.09%
5Y*
-23.08%
10Y*
-4.72%

FLYW

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
10.24%
6M
5.62%
1Y
41.65%
3Y*
-20.66%
5Y*
-16.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDOT vs. FLYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GDOT
Green Dot Corporation
3.04%20.39%7.47%-37.42%-56.35%-8.58%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
10.24%-31.33%-10.93%-5.39%-35.71%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between GDOT and FLYW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GDOT:

$765.81M

FLYW:

$2.00B

EPS

GDOT:

-$1.27

FLYW:

$99.12

PS Ratio

GDOT:

0.34

FLYW:

0.01

PB Ratio

GDOT:

0.81

FLYW:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

GDOT:

$2.18B

FLYW:

$188.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GDOT:

$323.19M

FLYW:

$299.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

GDOT:

$130.03M

FLYW:

$11.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDOT vs. FLYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDOT
GDOT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GDOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYW
FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDOT vs. FLYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDOTFLYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.49

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

3.83

-2.01

GDOT vs. FLYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the FLYW Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDOT and FLYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDOT vs. FLYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDOT drawdown since its inception was -93.17%, which is greater than FLYW's maximum drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOT and FLYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDOTFLYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.17%

-84.40%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.95%

-28.16%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.62%

-75.98%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.43%

-84.40%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.78%

-71.07%

-14.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.29%

-56.13%

-4.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.57%

10.91%

+6.66%

Volatility

GDOT vs. FLYW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is 5.83%, while Flywire Corporation (FLYW) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that GDOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDOTFLYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

14.48%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

37.11%

-20.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.90%

47.37%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.94%

57.20%

-6.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.34%

57.24%

-4.90%

Dividends

GDOT vs. FLYW - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDOT nor FLYW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GDOT vs. FLYW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Green Dot Corporation and Flywire Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
656.25M
188.11B
(GDOT) Total Revenue
(FLYW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GDOT vs. FLYW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Green Dot Corporation and Flywire Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
GDOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 656.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GDOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 656.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

FLYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported an operating income of 10.78B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

GDOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Dot Corporation reported a net income of 53.75M and revenue of 656.25M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

FLYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a net income of 12.52B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDOT and FLYW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLYW has higher volatility (14.48%) compared to GDOT (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDOT dropped -93.17% vs FLYW's -84.40%.

FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDOT and FLYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer