QTWO vs. PAM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM).

Performance

QTWO vs. PAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QTWO vs. PAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QTWO Q2 Holdings, Inc.	-34.31%	-28.31%	131.86%	61.56%	-66.18%	-37.22%	56.06%	63.63%	34.46%	27.73%
PAM Pampa Energía S.A.	-1.50%	0.65%	77.58%	55.04%	51.30%	53.19%	-16.13%	-48.35%	-52.72%	93.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap QTWO : $3.24B PAM : $4.74B
EPS QTWO : $0.75 PAM : $7.11
PE Ratio QTWO : 63.16 PAM : 12.26
PS Ratio QTWO : 4.13 PAM : 2.36
PB Ratio QTWO : 4.90 PAM : 1.32
Total Revenue (TTM) QTWO : $794.81M PAM : $2.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) QTWO : $429.68M PAM : $659.22M
EBITDA (TTM) QTWO : $90.36M PAM : $1.06B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a -34.31% return, which is significantly lower than PAM's -1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of 6.97%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.03% annualized return.

QTWO

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -34.31%
• 6M: -30.42%
• 1Y: -41.82%
• 3Y*: 24.40%
• 5Y*: -14.39%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

PAM

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 11.09%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 6M: 49.67%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: 38.27%
• 5Y*: 42.21%
• 10Y*: 15.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QTWO vs. PAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTWO

QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 8
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8

PAM

PAM Risk / Return Rank: 49
PAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PAM Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
PAM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTWO vs. PAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTWO	PAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	0.19	-1.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	0.73	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.09	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	0.39	-1.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	0.89	-2.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTWO vs. PAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the PAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and PAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTWO	PAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	0.19	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.92	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.29	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.26	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between QTWO and PAM is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QTWO vs. PAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTWO nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QTWO vs. PAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum PAM drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and PAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTWO	PAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.77%	-87.41%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.32%	-33.53%	-18.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.69%	-40.40%	-40.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.77%	-87.41%	+1.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.69%	-8.12%	-59.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.64%	-42.76%	+13.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.65%	14.51%	+12.14%

Volatility

QTWO vs. PAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) is 9.30%, while Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that QTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTWO	PAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.30%	10.10%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.72%	34.17%	-5.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.47%	55.88%	-12.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.12%	46.30%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.88%	52.00%	-8.12%

Financials

QTWO vs. PAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Pampa Energía S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

QTWO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 115.28M and revenue of 208.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

PAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a gross profit of 138.47M and revenue of 512.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

QTWO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.86M and revenue of 208.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

PAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported an operating income of 73.53M and revenue of 512.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

QTWO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 20.44M and revenue of 208.22M, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.

PAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pampa Energía S.A. reported a net income of 163.53M and revenue of 512.12M, resulting in a net margin of 31.9%.