QTWO vs. PAM

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a 141.17% return, which is significantly higher than PAM's 73.51% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of 17.86%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the PAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and PAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither QTWO nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, roughly equal to the maximum PAM drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and PAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) is 8.20%, while Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) has a volatility of 9.80%. This indicates that QTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Pampa Energía S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.