PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTWO vs. LDOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QTWO vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QTWO having a -41.67% return and LDOS slightly higher at -41.53%. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has underperformed LDOS with an annualized return of 4.40%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.


QTWO

1D
-1.77%
1M
-8.74%
YTD
-41.67%
6M
-43.82%
1Y
-52.44%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
-17.08%
10Y*
4.40%

LDOS

1D
-2.13%
1M
-16.51%
YTD
-41.53%
6M
-43.31%
1Y
-28.64%
3Y*
8.59%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTWO vs. LDOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
-41.67%-28.31%131.86%61.56%-66.18%-37.22%56.06%63.63%34.46%27.73%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
-41.53%26.50%34.52%4.50%20.04%-14.20%8.95%88.82%-16.72%29.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QTWO and LDOS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QTWO:

$2.85B

LDOS:

$13.42B

EPS

QTWO:

$1.07

LDOS:

$10.92

PE Ratio

QTWO:

39.24

LDOS:

9.60

PS Ratio

QTWO:

3.53

LDOS:

0.79

PB Ratio

QTWO:

4.65

LDOS:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

QTWO:

$821.58M

LDOS:

$17.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QTWO:

$456.61M

LDOS:

$3.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

QTWO:

$105.55M

LDOS:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTWO vs. LDOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTWO
QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
LDOS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
LDOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDOS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
LDOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDOS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTWO vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTWOLDOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

-0.61

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.48

-1.73

+0.25

QTWO vs. LDOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is comparable to the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and LDOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTWO vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, which is greater than LDOS's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and LDOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTWOLDOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.77%

-54.72%

-31.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.82%

-47.03%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.03%

-47.03%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.69%

-47.03%

-33.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.77%

-47.03%

-38.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.31%

-47.03%

-24.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.31%

-19.71%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.34%

16.57%

+18.77%

Volatility

QTWO vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) at 9.24%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTWOLDOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.09%

9.24%

+7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.08%

25.90%

+7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.12%

30.25%

+13.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.12%

26.93%

+23.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.32%

27.60%

+16.72%

Dividends

QTWO vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

QTWO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.61%0.90%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QTWO vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
216.51M
4.40B
(QTWO) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

QTWO vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Q2 Holdings, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
59.1%
17.3%
Portfolio components
QTWO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.91M and revenue of 216.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.

QTWO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.69M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

QTWO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 26.64M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QTWO and LDOS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTWO has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to LDOS (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTWO dropped -85.77% vs LDOS's -54.72%.

LDOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTWO and LDOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer