QRFT vs. VUG
QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QRFT is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 12.39%/yr vs 15.11%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
QRFT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return.
QRFT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
QRFT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 12.60% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.05% | 14.90% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 15.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and VUG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QRFT and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
QRFT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QRFT
VUG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
QRFT
VUG
Financial Services
QRFT
VUG
Communication Services
QRFT
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
QRFT
VUG
Industrials
QRFT
VUG
Healthcare
QRFT
VUG
Consumer Defensive
QRFT
VUG
Energy
QRFT
VUG
Basic Materials
QRFT
VUG
Utilities
QRFT
VUG
Real Estate
QRFT
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRFT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
QRFT
VUG
QRFT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRFT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.31 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.69 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 5.92 | +8.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRFT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.77 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.62 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRFT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -50.68% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -16.53% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -22.85% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -35.61% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.51% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -7.09% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 4.71% | -2.65% |
Volatility
QRFT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 3.45%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRFT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 3.83% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 12.11% | -2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 15.84% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 22.22% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 21.44% | -1.34% |
QRFT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRFT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QRFT and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to QRFT (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 12.39% for QRFT. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.25% for QRFT.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.03% for VUG.
QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRFT and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer