QRFT vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QRFT is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 10.89%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

QRFT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return.

QRFT

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 24.67%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRFT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	9.72%	17.95%	21.36%	24.16%	-22.69%	22.74%	40.05%	15.22%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.19%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and VOO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.90

The correlation between QRFT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRFT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRFT	VOO
Technology	38.7%	39.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	9.8%
Financial Services	10.6%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.6%	8.3%
Industrials	8.4%	7.6%
Communication Services	8.2%	10.5%
Energy	4.3%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.8%
Utilities	1.5%	2.5%

Return for Risk

QRFT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT

QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 58
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRFT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRFT	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.91	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.60	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.67	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	11.96	-0.43

QRFT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRFT	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.19%	-33.99%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.12%	-8.90%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	-18.69%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	-24.52%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-3.14%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-3.68%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.99%	+0.16%

Volatility

QRFT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that QRFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRFT	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	4.83%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.14%	9.82%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	12.46%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	16.91%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.13%	18.02%	+2.11%

QRFT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRFT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.26%	0.27%	0.52%	0.77%	0.83%	0.05%	1.81%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRFT and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, QRFT and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QRFT or VOO?

QRFT has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, QRFT or VOO?

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.13% vs 10.89% for QRFT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRFT or VOO?

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRFT or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRFT or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.26% for QRFT.

What is the main difference between QRFT and VOO?

QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.