PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRFT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRFT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


QRFT

1D
-0.34%
1M
6.39%
YTD
12.60%
6M
12.89%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRFT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
12.60%17.95%21.36%24.16%-22.69%22.74%40.05%14.90%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and VOO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019

0.90

The correlation between QRFT and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRFT vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QRFT
VOO

Technology

35.4%
35.7%

Financial Services

10.7%
11.6%

Communication Services

10.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.2%

Industrials

9.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
4.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.9%

Technology

QRFT
35.4%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

QRFT
10.7%
VOO
11.6%

Communication Services

QRFT
10.2%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QRFT
10.1%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

QRFT
9.7%
VOO
8.3%

Healthcare

QRFT
8.8%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

QRFT
6.7%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

QRFT
4.2%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

QRFT
2.0%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

QRFT
1.4%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

QRFT
1.0%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRFT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT
QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRFT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRFTVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.39

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.25

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.16

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.12

14.73

-0.61

QRFT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRFTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.39

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.83

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.89

-0.03

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRFTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.19%

-33.99%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-8.90%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-18.69%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-24.52%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.70%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-3.69%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.91%

+0.15%

Volatility

QRFT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that QRFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRFTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

2.84%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

8.90%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

11.80%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.81%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

18.01%

+2.09%

QRFT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRFT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.25%0.27%0.52%0.77%0.83%0.05%1.81%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QRFT and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QRFT has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 12.39% for QRFT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.25% for QRFT.

QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRFT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer