PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRFT vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRFT vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 20.72% return.


QRFT

1D
0.00%
1M
1.66%
6M
10.76%
YTD
11.89%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.79%

QVAL

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.77%
6M
14.38%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.12M$598.10K$292.56K
$1.37M$1.75M$1.48M

QRFT vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
11.89%17.95%21.36%24.16%-22.69%22.74%40.05%15.22%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
20.72%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and QVAL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019

0.62

The correlation between QRFT and QVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QRFT vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QRFT
QVAL

Technology

40.5%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
21.6%

Healthcare

10.0%
14.1%

Industrials

9.7%
12.3%

Financial Services

8.2%

-

Communication Services

7.9%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.9%

Energy

3.4%
20.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
8.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.0%

Utilities

0.6%
2.0%

Technology

QRFT
40.5%
QVAL
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QRFT
11.3%
QVAL
21.6%

Healthcare

QRFT
10.0%
QVAL
14.1%

Industrials

QRFT
9.7%
QVAL
12.3%

Financial Services

QRFT
8.2%
QVAL

-

Communication Services

QRFT
7.9%
QVAL
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

QRFT
5.3%
QVAL
5.9%

Energy

QRFT
3.4%
QVAL
20.3%

Basic Materials

QRFT
1.7%
QVAL
8.0%

Real Estate

QRFT
1.6%
QVAL
2.0%

Utilities

QRFT
0.6%
QVAL
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRFT vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QRFT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QRFT vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRFTQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

6.18

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

19.14

-9.57

QRFT vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRFTQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.19%

-51.49%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-6.04%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-21.41%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-27.17%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.04%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-7.69%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.95%

+0.26%

Volatility

QRFT vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 2.99%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRFTQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.51%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

10.20%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

14.34%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

21.56%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

22.70%

-2.66%

QRFT vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRFT vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

QRFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QRFT
QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.27%0.27%0.52%0.77%0.83%0.05%1.81%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.42%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRFT and QVAL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to QRFT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 5-year performance, QVAL leads with 12.93% vs 10.62% for QRFT. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.27% for QRFT.

QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QVAL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRFT and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer