QRFT vs. ARKK
QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QRFT returned 12.39%/yr vs -6.26%/yr for ARKK. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
QRFT vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's 1.61% return.
QRFT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKK
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- -6.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
QRFT vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 12.60% | 17.95% | 21.36% | 24.16% | -22.69% | 22.74% | 40.05% | 14.90% |
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 1.61% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 14.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRFT and ARKK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QRFT and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
QRFT vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QRFT
ARKK
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QRFT
ARKK
Financial Services
QRFT
ARKK
Communication Services
QRFT
ARKK
Consumer Cyclical
QRFT
ARKK
Industrials
QRFT
ARKK
Healthcare
QRFT
ARKK
Consumer Defensive
QRFT
ARKK
-
Energy
QRFT
ARKK
-
Basic Materials
QRFT
ARKK
-
Utilities
QRFT
ARKK
-
Real Estate
QRFT
ARKK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRFT vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank
QRFT
ARKK
QRFT vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRFT | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.12 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 2.49 | +11.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRFT | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 0.96 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.14 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.35 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
QRFT vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and ARKK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRFT | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.19% | -80.97% | +50.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -31.35% | +22.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -39.56% | +19.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -77.23% | +49.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -49.39% | +49.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -30.12% | +23.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 14.06% | -12.00% |
Volatility
QRFT vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 3.45%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRFT | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 9.45% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 25.08% | -15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 36.37% | -23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 46.28% | -28.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 40.26% | -20.16% |
QRFT vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QRFT and ARKK have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
QRFT vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison
QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRFT and ARKK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to QRFT (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs ARKK's -80.97%.
On 5-year performance, QRFT leads with 12.39% vs -6.26% for ARKK. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -6.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QRFT and ARKK have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
QRFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
QRFT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARK.
QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRFT and ARKK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer