QRFT vs. GQGU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QRFT returned 22.68% vs 4.73% for GQGU. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. QRFT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.

Performance

QRFT vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRFT achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 5.74% return.

QRFT

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 10.60%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 1Y: 22.68%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 4.51%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRFT vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	11.77%	9.68%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	5.74%	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QRFT and GQGU is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	-0.22

Return for Risk

QRFT vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRFT

QRFT Risk / Return Rank: 63
QRFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QRFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QRFT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QRFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QRFT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

GQGU

GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 17
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 15
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRFT vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRFT	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	0.44	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	0.71	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.08	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	0.56	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	1.36	+8.96

QRFT vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRFT Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the GQGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRFT and GQGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRFT vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRFT drawdown since its inception was -30.19%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRFT and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRFT	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.19%	-8.41%	-21.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.12%	-8.41%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-5.42%	+4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.71%	-2.91%	-3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.48%	-1.28%

Volatility

QRFT vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is 4.04%, while GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that QRFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRFT	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.04%	4.36%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	8.52%	+2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.09%	10.71%	+3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	10.68%	+6.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.07%	10.68%	+9.39%

QRFT vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRFT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRFT vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

QRFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.25%	0.27%	0.52%	0.77%	0.83%	0.05%	1.81%	4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRFT and GQGU in my portfolio?

QRFT and GQGU have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRFT or GQGU?

GQGU has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to QRFT (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRFT dropped -30.19% vs GQGU's -8.41%.

Which ETF is better, QRFT or GQGU?

On 1-year performance, QRFT leads with 22.68% vs 4.73% for GQGU. On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QRFT has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRFT or GQGU?

Over the 1-year period, QRFT has performed better with a 22.68% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRFT or GQGU?

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QRFT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRFT or GQGU?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.25% for QRFT.

What is the main difference between QRFT and GQGU?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QRFT and 0.49% for GQGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.