QQXT vs. CIBR
QQXT (First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXT is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQXT returned 10.59%/yr vs 17.93%/yr for CIBR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
QQXT vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 10.59%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return.
QQXT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 0.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
CIBR
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 17.93%
QQXT vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | -2.44% | 8.02% | 6.71% | 16.81% | -13.09% | 12.02% | 36.85% | 28.02% | -5.74% | 20.69% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 18.06% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 50.53% | 28.52% | 1.47% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXT and CIBR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and CIBR has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQXT vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQXT
CIBR
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
QQXT
CIBR
Consumer Cyclical
QQXT
CIBR
-
Healthcare
QQXT
CIBR
-
Consumer Defensive
QQXT
CIBR
-
Communication Services
QQXT
CIBR
Utilities
QQXT
CIBR
-
Energy
QQXT
CIBR
-
Technology
QQXT
CIBR
Basic Materials
QQXT
CIBR
-
Financial Services
QQXT
CIBR
-
Real Estate
QQXT
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXT vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
QQXT
CIBR
QQXT vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.12 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.69 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 1.60 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXT vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.45% | -33.89% | -23.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -21.99% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | -21.99% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.74% | -33.89% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | -33.89% | +3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -10.72% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -8.66% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 9.51% | -6.08% |
Volatility
QQXT vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.00%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.03%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXT | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 12.03% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.95% | 21.54% | -13.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 25.21% | -14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 25.07% | -8.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 23.60% | -6.11% |
QQXT vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQXT and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
QQXT vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than CIBR's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.49% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
QQXT First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund | 1.24% | 1.20% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.92% | 0.35% | 0.28% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXT and CIBR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to QQXT (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.93% vs 10.59% for QQXT. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQXT and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.
QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQXT and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer