PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.59%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


QQXT

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.95%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
10.59%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQXT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
-2.44%8.02%6.71%16.81%-13.09%12.02%36.85%28.02%-5.74%20.69%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and VGT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2007

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and VGT has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQXT vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQXT
VGT

Industrials

21.8%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

16.4%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

14.5%

-

Communication Services

10.9%
0.5%

Utilities

7.3%

-

Energy

3.6%
0.3%

Technology

3.6%
98.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

1.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Industrials

QQXT
21.8%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQXT
16.4%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

QQXT
16.4%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

QQXT
14.5%
VGT

-

Communication Services

QQXT
10.9%
VGT
0.5%

Utilities

QQXT
7.3%
VGT

-

Energy

QQXT
3.6%
VGT
0.3%

Technology

QQXT
3.6%
VGT
98.5%

Basic Materials

QQXT
1.8%
VGT
0.0%

Financial Services

QQXT
1.8%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

QQXT
1.4%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQXT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.35

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

2.87

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

8.76

-8.55

QQXT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-54.63%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-16.40%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-27.23%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-35.07%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-35.07%

+4.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-7.71%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.10%

-7.95%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

5.36%

-1.93%

Volatility

QQXT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 3.00%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

11.39%

-8.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

18.58%

-10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

22.72%

-11.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

25.55%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

24.77%

-7.28%

QQXT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.24%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and VGT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to QQXT (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.49% vs 10.59% for QQXT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.49% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

QQXT is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VGT is Technology Equities. QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer