PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQXT vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQXT vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQXT achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 29.69% return. Over the past 10 years, QQXT has underperformed QTEC with an annualized return of 10.08%, while QTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.


QQXT

1D
0.34%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.24%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
10.08%
ALL TIME*
9.10%

QTEC

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.23%
6M
26.76%
YTD
29.69%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
21.00%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$256.86K$416.10K$546.96K
$78.15M$73.99M$89.17M

QQXT vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.14%8.02%6.71%16.81%-13.09%12.02%36.85%28.02%-5.74%20.69%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
29.69%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%

Correlation

The correlation between QQXT and QTEC is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2007

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between QQXT and QTEC has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQXT vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQXT
QTEC

Consumer Cyclical

17.1%
2.1%

Industrials

17.0%
2.1%

Healthcare

17.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

15.4%

-

Communication Services

11.1%
8.3%

Technology

7.6%
85.4%

Utilities

7.6%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Financial Services

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQXT
17.1%
QTEC
2.1%

Industrials

QQXT
17.0%
QTEC
2.1%

Healthcare

QQXT
17.0%
QTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

QQXT
15.4%
QTEC

-

Communication Services

QQXT
11.1%
QTEC
8.3%

Technology

QQXT
7.6%
QTEC
85.4%

Utilities

QQXT
7.6%
QTEC

-

Energy

QQXT
3.4%
QTEC

-

Basic Materials

QQXT
2.0%
QTEC

-

Financial Services

QQXT
1.8%
QTEC

-

Real Estate

QQXT
1.4%
QTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQXT vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQXT
QQXT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
QQXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQXT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
QQXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQXT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQXT vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQXTQTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.24

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.46

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

6.90

-6.11

QQXT vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQXT and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQXT vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQXT drawdown since its inception was -57.45%, roughly equal to the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXT and QTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQXTQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-58.86%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-16.03%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-29.00%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.74%

-45.54%

+20.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-45.54%

+15.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-11.08%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-9.86%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

5.72%

-2.21%

Volatility

QQXT vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is 4.14%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that QQXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQXTQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

9.69%

-5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

23.97%

-15.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

28.24%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

30.05%

-13.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

27.88%

-10.41%

QQXT vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQXT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQXT vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

QQXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than QTEC's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQXT
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
1.23%1.20%0.98%1.10%0.92%0.35%0.28%0.35%0.38%0.32%0.31%0.40%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQXT and QTEC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEC has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to QQXT (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQXT dropped -57.45% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 21.00% vs 10.08% for QQXT. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQXT has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QQXT.

QQXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.01% for QTEC.

QQXT tracks NASDAQ-100 Ex-Tech Sector Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QQXT and 0.57% for QTEC.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQXT and QTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer