QQQ vs. MDY
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while MDY is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for MDY. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for MDY.
Performance
QQQ vs. MDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than MDY's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed MDY with an annualized return of 21.79%, while MDY has yielded a comparatively lower 11.33% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
MDY
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
QQQ vs. MDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 15.28% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and MDY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QQQ and MDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. MDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
MDY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
MDY
Communication Services
QQQ
MDY
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
MDY
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
MDY
Healthcare
QQQ
MDY
Industrials
QQQ
MDY
Utilities
QQQ
MDY
Basic Materials
QQQ
MDY
Energy
QQQ
MDY
Financial Services
QQQ
MDY
Real Estate
QQQ
MDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. MDY — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
MDY
QQQ vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.91 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 10.60 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than MDY's maximum drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and MDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -55.33% | -27.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -8.82% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -24.03% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -24.03% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -42.22% | +7.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | 0.00% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -7.02% | -25.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.42% | +0.78% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) at 5.04%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | MDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 5.04% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 11.68% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 15.83% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 19.82% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 21.21% | +1.17% |
QQQ vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than MDY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and MDY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to MDY (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs MDY's -55.33%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 11.33% for MDY. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MDY is Mid Cap Blend Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.23% for MDY.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and MDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer