PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. IMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. IMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly lower than IMO's 41.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed IMO with an annualized return of 21.79%, while IMO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.61% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.93%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
35.82%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%

IMO

1D
0.26%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
41.99%
6M
33.35%
1Y
56.95%
3Y*
37.72%
5Y*
32.35%
10Y*
17.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. IMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
41.99%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and IMO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.27

The correlation between QQQ and IMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. IMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. IMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQIMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.47

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

10.04

+1.18

QQQ vs. IMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the IMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and IMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. IMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, roughly equal to the maximum IMO drawdown of -84.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and IMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-84.82%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-16.51%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-22.95%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-29.72%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-76.96%

+41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-11.88%

+8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-21.19%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

5.69%

-2.49%

Volatility

QQQ vs. IMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQIMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

9.97%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

22.21%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

27.31%

-10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

32.66%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

35.55%

-13.17%

Dividends

QQQ vs. IMO - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IMO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
1.90%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and IMO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IMO has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs IMO's -84.82%.

IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and IMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer