PortfoliosLab logo
IMO vs. IMO.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and IMO.TO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%4,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3,469.32%
1,360.05%
IMO
IMO.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMO:

0.10

IMO.TO:

0.07

Sortino Ratio

IMO:

0.35

IMO.TO:

0.30

Omega Ratio

IMO:

1.05

IMO.TO:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

IMO:

0.14

IMO.TO:

0.10

Martin Ratio

IMO:

0.30

IMO.TO:

0.25

Ulcer Index

IMO:

10.25%

IMO.TO:

8.35%

Daily Std Dev

IMO:

32.24%

IMO.TO:

31.42%

Max Drawdown

IMO:

-84.96%

IMO.TO:

-79.18%

Current Drawdown

IMO:

-13.36%

IMO.TO:

-12.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMO:

$35.01B

IMO.TO:

CA$47.34B

EPS

IMO:

$6.75

IMO.TO:

CA$9.03

PE Ratio

IMO:

10.19

IMO.TO:

10.30

PEG Ratio

IMO:

0.85

IMO.TO:

0.53

PS Ratio

IMO:

0.68

IMO.TO:

0.94

PB Ratio

IMO:

2.06

IMO.TO:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMO:

$37.17B

IMO.TO:

CA$37.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMO:

$5.26B

IMO.TO:

CA$5.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMO:

$6.15B

IMO.TO:

CA$4.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than IMO.TO's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has underperformed IMO.TO with an annualized return of 7.53%, while IMO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.


IMO

YTD

10.76%

1M

6.68%

6M

-3.03%

1Y

2.10%

5Y*

39.82%

10Y*

7.53%

IMO.TO

YTD

6.03%

1M

3.51%

6M

-4.24%

1Y

2.23%

5Y*

38.26%

10Y*

8.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMO vs. IMO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMO is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMO is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMO is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMO is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMO is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMO is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IMO.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IMO.TO is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IMO.TO is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IMO.TO is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IMO.TO is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IMO.TO is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IMO.TO is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the IMO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and IMO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.02
-0.05
IMO
IMO.TO

Dividends

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than IMO.TO's 1.94% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.67%2.84%2.50%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.39%1.55%1.39%1.29%1.70%
IMO.TO
Imperial Oil Limited
1.94%1.98%1.89%1.71%1.80%2.73%1.87%1.62%1.25%0.96%0.91%1.21%

Drawdowns

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than IMO.TO's maximum drawdown of -79.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and IMO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.36%
-13.95%
IMO
IMO.TO

Volatility

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Imperial Oil Limited (IMO.TO) have volatilities of 16.02% and 16.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.02%
16.15%
IMO
IMO.TO

Financials

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Imperial Oil Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
11.92B
11.92B
(IMO) Total Revenue
(IMO.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IMO values in USD, IMO.TO values in CAD

IMO vs. IMO.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Oil Limited and Imperial Oil Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
14.9%
14.9%
(IMO) Gross Margin
(IMO.TO) Gross Margin
IMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 11.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.9%.

IMO.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 1.77B and revenue of 11.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.9%.

IMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.52B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

IMO.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.52B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

IMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

IMO.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.