PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMO vs. CVE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and CVE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

IMO vs. CVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.19%
-21.38%
IMO
CVE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IMO:

0.49

CVE:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

IMO:

0.82

CVE:

-0.29

Omega Ratio

IMO:

1.10

CVE:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

IMO:

0.61

CVE:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

IMO:

1.98

CVE:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

IMO:

6.63%

CVE:

14.75%

Daily Std Dev

IMO:

26.71%

CVE:

28.28%

Max Drawdown

IMO:

-84.96%

CVE:

-95.01%

Current Drawdown

IMO:

-21.61%

CVE:

-51.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMO:

$34.53B

CVE:

$27.11B

EPS

IMO:

$6.40

CVE:

$1.40

PE Ratio

IMO:

10.30

CVE:

10.55

PEG Ratio

IMO:

0.85

CVE:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMO:

$49.29B

CVE:

$55.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMO:

$7.19B

CVE:

$9.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMO:

$8.23B

CVE:

$10.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than CVE's -10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed CVE with an annualized return of 5.75%, while CVE has yielded a comparatively lower -1.70% annualized return.


IMO

YTD

10.71%

1M

-18.19%

6M

-5.19%

1Y

12.54%

5Y*

22.47%

10Y*

5.75%

CVE

YTD

-10.37%

1M

-10.01%

6M

-21.38%

1Y

-10.48%

5Y*

10.02%

10Y*

-1.70%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMO vs. CVE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMO, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.49-0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMO, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82-0.29
The chart of Omega ratio for IMO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.100.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMO, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.61-0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for IMO, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.98-0.66
IMO
CVE

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the CVE Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and CVE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.49
-0.34
IMO
CVE

Dividends

IMO vs. CVE - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than CVE's 4.11% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.84%2.50%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.39%1.55%1.39%1.29%1.70%1.06%
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
4.11%2.34%1.81%0.57%0.75%1.58%2.17%1.70%1.01%5.25%4.64%3.27%

Drawdowns

IMO vs. CVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, smaller than the maximum CVE drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and CVE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-21.61%
-51.17%
IMO
CVE

Volatility

IMO vs. CVE - Volatility Comparison

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE) at 7.40%. This indicates that IMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.53%
7.40%
IMO
CVE

Financials

IMO vs. CVE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab