PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMO vs. NTDOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IMO vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 34.20% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -36.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of 17.15%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.


IMO

1D
0.55%
1M
-13.50%
YTD
34.20%
6M
34.97%
1Y
48.23%
3Y*
37.13%
5Y*
32.04%
10Y*
17.15%

NTDOY

1D
-0.56%
1M
-6.24%
YTD
-36.71%
6M
-36.11%
1Y
-50.94%
3Y*
0.20%
5Y*
-5.79%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMO vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
34.20%43.85%10.47%20.89%38.00%95.29%-25.37%7.16%-17.21%-8.36%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
-36.71%16.19%13.11%24.66%-10.74%-27.51%61.36%50.76%-26.56%76.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IMO and NTDOY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IMO:

$55.58B

NTDOY:

$49.43B

EPS

IMO:

$5.87

NTDOY:

¥92.44

PE Ratio

IMO:

19.53

NTDOY:

18.65

PEG Ratio

IMO:

0.43

NTDOY:

3.36

PS Ratio

IMO:

1.23

NTDOY:

3.42

PB Ratio

IMO:

2.44

NTDOY:

2.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

IMO:

$46.55B

NTDOY:

¥2.34T

Gross Profit (TTM)

IMO:

$7.69B

NTDOY:

¥921.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

IMO:

$6.36B

NTDOY:

¥500.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMO vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMO
IMO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

NTDOY
NTDOY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NTDOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTDOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTDOY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NTDOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTDOY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMO vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMONTDOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.76

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

-0.88

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

-1.53

+9.34

IMO vs. NTDOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the NTDOY Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMO and NTDOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMO vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, roughly equal to the maximum NTDOY drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and NTDOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMONTDOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-83.59%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.23%

-58.02%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.95%

-58.02%

+35.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

-58.02%

+28.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.96%

-58.02%

-18.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.71%

-57.13%

+40.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.18%

-37.60%

+16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

33.32%

-27.13%

Volatility

IMO vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) is 9.55%, while Nintendo Co ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that IMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMONTDOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

13.02%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

32.54%

-10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.38%

39.48%

-12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

30.41%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.56%

36.42%

-0.86%

Dividends

IMO vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison

IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while NTDOY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMO
Imperial Oil Limited
2.01%2.40%2.84%2.73%2.30%2.28%3.50%2.41%2.36%2.02%1.70%1.66%
NTDOY
Nintendo Co ADR
0.00%0.87%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.56%1.23%

Financials

IMO vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Nintendo Co ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B20222023202420252026
12.45B
414.65B
(IMO) Total Revenue
(NTDOY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IMO values in USD, NTDOY values in JPY

IMO vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Imperial Oil Limited and Nintendo Co ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
20.2%
48.3%
Portfolio components
IMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 2.51B and revenue of 12.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

NTDOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

IMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

NTDOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

IMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 940.00M and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

NTDOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nintendo Co ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IMO and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTDOY has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to IMO (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.

IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMO and NTDOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer