IMO vs. NTDOY
IMO (Imperial Oil Limited) and NTDOY (Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR) are both stocks. IMO operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while NTDOY operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, IMO returned 18.32%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for NTDOY. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IMO vs. NTDOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 47.91% return, which is significantly higher than NTDOY's -28.05% return. Over the past 10 years, IMO has outperformed NTDOY with an annualized return of 18.32%, while NTDOY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.
IMO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 47.91%
- 1Y
- 54.98%
- 3Y*
- 36.98%
- 5Y*
- 40.24%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.87%
NTDOY
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 9.43%
- 6M
- -25.40%
- YTD
- -28.05%
- 1Y
- -42.27%
- 3Y*
- 4.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $69.44M | $66.23M | $68.94M | |
| $53.70M | $58.18M | $46.32M |
IMO vs. NTDOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 47.91% | 43.85% | 10.47% | 20.89% | 38.00% | 95.29% | -25.37% | 7.16% | -17.21% | -8.36% |
NTDOY Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR | -28.05% | 16.19% | 13.11% | 24.66% | -10.74% | -27.51% | 61.36% | 50.76% | -26.56% | 76.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMO and NTDOY is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
IMO:
$61.90B
NTDOY:
$55.80B
IMO:
$8.91
NTDOY:
¥92.48
IMO:
14.19
NTDOY:
20.48
IMO:
0.31
NTDOY:
3.69
IMO:
1.11
NTDOY:
3.76
IMO:
2.50
NTDOY:
2.96
IMO:
$55.99B
NTDOY:
¥2.34T
IMO:
$9.85B
NTDOY:
¥921.95B
IMO:
$8.68B
NTDOY:
¥500.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMO vs. NTDOY — Risk / Return Rank
IMO
NTDOY
IMO vs. NTDOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMO | NTDOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.82 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | -0.72 | +3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | -1.11 | +8.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMO vs. NTDOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, roughly equal to the maximum NTDOY drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and NTDOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMO | NTDOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.82% | -83.59% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -59.06% | +39.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.95% | -59.06% | +36.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.72% | -59.06% | +29.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.96% | -59.06% | -17.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.21% | -51.27% | +43.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.16% | -37.68% | +16.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 38.07% | -30.54% |
Volatility
IMO vs. NTDOY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) is 8.25%, while Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR (NTDOY) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that IMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTDOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMO | NTDOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 10.90% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.42% | 32.84% | -11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.13% | 40.71% | -12.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 30.74% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 33.50% | +2.08% |
Dividends
IMO vs. NTDOY - Dividend Comparison
IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while NTDOY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 1.83% | 2.40% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 3.50% | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.66% |
NTDOY Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR | 0.00% | 0.87% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.56% | 1.23% |
Financials
IMO vs. NTDOY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMO vs. NTDOY - Profitability Comparison
IMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 16.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.4%.
NTDOY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR reported a gross profit of 200.11B and revenue of 414.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.
IMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 2.86B and revenue of 16.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
NTDOY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR reported an operating income of 60.82B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
IMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 16.07B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
NTDOY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nintendo Co., Ltd. ADR reported a net income of 66.39B and revenue of 414.65B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMO and NTDOY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTDOY has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to IMO (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs NTDOY's -83.59%.
IMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMO and NTDOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer