IMO vs. EC
IMO (Imperial Oil Limited) and EC (Ecopetrol S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Integrated industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, IMO returned 18.85%/yr vs 19.54%/yr for EC. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
IMO vs. EC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMO achieves a 51.68% return, which is significantly lower than EC's 75.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMO having a 18.85% annualized return and EC not far ahead at 19.54%.
IMO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 29.30%
- YTD
- 51.68%
- 1Y
- 58.93%
- 3Y*
- 37.81%
- 5Y*
- 40.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
EC
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 40.04%
- YTD
- 75.68%
- 1Y
- 112.34%
- 3Y*
- 36.49%
- 5Y*
- 22.09%
- 10Y*
- 19.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.19M | $36.57M | $44.75M | |
| $66.83M | $65.55M | $68.60M |
IMO vs. EC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 51.68% | 43.85% | 10.47% | 20.89% | 38.00% | 95.29% | -25.37% | 7.16% | -17.21% | -8.36% |
EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 75.68% | 58.65% | -24.25% | 41.83% | -5.04% | 0.57% | -29.31% | 38.58% | 11.95% | 64.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMO and EC is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2008 | 0.54 |
The correlation between IMO and EC shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMO:
$64.33B
EC:
$34.48B
IMO:
$5.92
EC:
COP 4.26K
IMO:
21.89
EC:
12.26
IMO:
1.37
EC:
0.92
IMO:
2.76
EC:
1.34
IMO:
$46.55B
EC:
COP 116.38T
IMO:
$7.69B
EC:
COP 37.91T
IMO:
$6.36B
EC:
COP 42.24T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMO vs. EC — Risk / Return Rank
IMO
EC
IMO vs. EC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) and Ecopetrol S.A. (EC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMO | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 7.81 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 18.87 | -11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMO vs. EC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMO drawdown since its inception was -84.82%, smaller than the maximum EC drawdown of -90.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMO and EC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMO | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.82% | -90.16% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -14.11% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.95% | -38.00% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.72% | -48.60% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.96% | -73.36% | -3.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -15.05% | +9.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.16% | -50.95% | +29.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 5.83% | +1.68% |
Volatility
IMO vs. EC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) is 7.83%, while Ecopetrol S.A. (EC) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that IMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMO | EC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 8.78% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 31.57% | -9.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.98% | 38.35% | -10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.36% | 37.73% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.57% | 40.81% | -5.24% |
Dividends
IMO vs. EC - Dividend Comparison
IMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than EC's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC Ecopetrol S.A. | 3.94% | 20.77% | 20.47% | 22.02% | 22.47% | 0.72% | 6.92% | 9.87% | 4.01% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 14.83% |
IMO Imperial Oil Limited | 1.78% | 2.40% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 3.50% | 2.41% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.66% |
Financials
IMO vs. EC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Imperial Oil Limited and Ecopetrol S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IMO vs. EC - Profitability Comparison
IMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a gross profit of 2.51B and revenue of 12.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.
EC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a gross profit of 11.03T and revenue of 28.41T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
IMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
EC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported an operating income of 8.50T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.
IMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Imperial Oil Limited reported a net income of 940.00M and revenue of 12.45B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
EC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ecopetrol S.A. reported a net income of 2.87T and revenue of 28.41T, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IMO and EC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EC has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to IMO (7.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMO dropped -84.82% vs EC's -90.16%.
EC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMO and EC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer