QQMG vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 29.47%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

QQMG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.45% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return.

QQMG

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 9.97%
• YTD: 21.45%
• 6M: 20.28%
• 1Y: 43.12%
• 3Y*: 29.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 6M: 6.01%
• 1Y: 24.63%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 15.67%
• 10Y*: 18.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.45%	22.16%	25.66%	55.00%	-31.56%	5.01%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.78%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and SCHG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.97

The correlation between QQMG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQMG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQMG	SCHG
Technology	62.1%	46.3%
Communication Services	13.0%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	12.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	1.7%
Healthcare	3.5%	7.7%
Industrials	2.1%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.4%
Utilities	0.2%	0.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	6.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.5%
Energy	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

QQMG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 40
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQMG	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	1.60	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.18	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.28	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	1.51	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.72	5.04	+7.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQMG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQMG	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	1.60	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.85	-0.11

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQMG	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-34.59%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-16.41%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-23.39%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.44%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.60%	-5.20%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	4.90%	-1.50%

Volatility

QQMG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQMG	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	3.61%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.88%	11.62%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	15.49%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.59%	22.26%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.59%	21.55%	+2.04%

QQMG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQMG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.34%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQMG and SCHG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QQMG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQMG or SCHG?

QQMG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, QQMG or SCHG?

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.47% vs 25.14% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQMG or SCHG?

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.47% return vs 25.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQMG or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQMG or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between QQMG and SCHG?

QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.