PortfoliosLab logo
QQMG vs. BBLU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and BBLU is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QQMG vs. BBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
87.75%
70.42%
QQMG
BBLU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQMG:

0.43

BBLU:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

QQMG:

0.75

BBLU:

0.93

Omega Ratio

QQMG:

1.10

BBLU:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

QQMG:

0.47

BBLU:

0.61

Martin Ratio

QQMG:

1.52

BBLU:

2.26

Ulcer Index

QQMG:

7.10%

BBLU:

4.63%

Daily Std Dev

QQMG:

25.93%

BBLU:

17.94%

Max Drawdown

QQMG:

-35.43%

BBLU:

-17.20%

Current Drawdown

QQMG:

-9.35%

BBLU:

-8.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than BBLU's -3.98% return.


QQMG

YTD

-4.66%

1M

17.41%

6M

-5.63%

1Y

11.11%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BBLU

YTD

-3.98%

1M

10.30%

6M

-3.61%

1Y

10.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQMG vs. BBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQMG vs. BBLU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQMG is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQMG is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQMG is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQMG is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQMG is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQMG is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BBLU is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BBLU is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BBLU is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BBLU is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BBLU is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BBLU is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQMG vs. BBLU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the BBLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and BBLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.43
0.59
QQMG
BBLU

Dividends

QQMG vs. BBLU - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than BBLU's 1.44% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.60%0.83%0.08%
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
1.44%1.39%1.68%32.07%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. BBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than BBLU's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and BBLU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.35%
-8.67%
QQMG
BBLU

Volatility

QQMG vs. BBLU - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 13.91% compared to Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) at 10.26%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.91%
10.26%
QQMG
BBLU