QQMG vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Invesco - QQMG tracks the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index while QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 29.63%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

QQMG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQMG having a 21.86% return and QQQM slightly lower at 21.39%.

QQMG

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 11.51%
• YTD: 21.86%
• 6M: 20.50%
• 1Y: 44.32%
• 3Y*: 29.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.86%	22.16%	25.66%	55.00%	-31.56%	5.01%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and QQQM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.99

The correlation between QQMG and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQMG vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQMG	QQQM
Technology	62.1%	53.8%
Communication Services	13.0%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	7.7%
Healthcare	3.5%	4.2%
Industrials	2.1%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.1%
Utilities	0.2%	1.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%
Energy	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

QQMG vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQMG	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.65	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.46	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.45	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	3.53	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.08	13.52	-0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQMG vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQMG	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.65	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.85	-0.11

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQMG	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-35.04%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-11.96%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-22.70%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.20%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.61%	-8.25%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	3.11%	+0.29%

Volatility

QQMG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQMG	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	4.48%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	12.05%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.77%	15.91%	+0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	22.24%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	22.12%	+1.48%

QQMG vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQMG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.34%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQMG and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QQMG and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQMG or QQQM?

QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, QQMG or QQQM?

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.63% vs 28.89% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQMG or QQQM?

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 28.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQMG or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQMG or QQQM?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between QQMG and QQQM?

QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.