PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQMG vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQMG vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's 19.07% return.


QQMG

1D
-0.41%
1M
11.51%
YTD
21.86%
6M
20.50%
1Y
44.32%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.86%22.16%25.66%9.19%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
19.07%14.96%7.70%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and QQQY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.91

The correlation between QQMG and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQMG vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG
QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQMGQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.66

2.68

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.37

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

3.28

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.08

13.95

-0.88

QQMG vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQMGQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.68

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.25

-0.51

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQMGQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-19.05%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-11.14%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.36%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-2.91%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.61%

+0.79%

Volatility

QQMG vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.21%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQMGQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

4.21%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

11.30%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

13.67%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.60%

14.75%

+8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

14.75%

+8.85%

QQMG vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQMG vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQQY's 34.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.34%0.41%0.50%0.60%0.82%0.08%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, QQMG and QQQY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQMG leads with 44.32% vs 36.38% for QQQY. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 44.32% return vs 36.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQMG and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer