QQH vs. ENFR
QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQH returned 13.21%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
QQH vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.
QQH
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 36.39%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
QQH vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 11.37% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.09% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and ENFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019 | 0.25 |
The correlation between QQH and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
ENFR
QQH vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQH | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.89 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 7.40 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQH vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -68.28% | +26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -8.64% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.84% | -15.58% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -20.29% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -6.12% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -15.94% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 3.36% | +2.71% |
Volatility
QQH vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.42%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | 5.42% | +5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.38% | 11.57% | +5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.77% | 14.82% | +7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 19.24% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 24.68% | +0.27% |
QQH vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQH vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQH and ENFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQH has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to ENFR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 19.69% vs 13.21% for QQH. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 19.69% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.19% for QQH.
QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQH and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer