ENFR vs. SPY
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.81%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ENFR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.81%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
ENFR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and SPY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.49 |
The correlation between ENFR and SPY shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ENFR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENFR
SPY
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
ENFR
SPY
Industrials
ENFR
SPY
Utilities
ENFR
SPY
Financial Services
ENFR
SPY
Basic Materials
ENFR
-
SPY
Communication Services
ENFR
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ENFR
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ENFR
-
SPY
Healthcare
ENFR
-
SPY
Real Estate
ENFR
-
SPY
Technology
ENFR
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
SPY
ENFR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.01 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 13.54 | -6.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -55.19% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.88% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -18.76% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -24.50% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -33.72% | -28.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | -1.75% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -9.04% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.97% | +1.39% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 4.64% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.75% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 12.43% | +2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 17.14% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 17.99% | +6.69% |
ENFR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and SPY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 11.81% for ENFR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer