QPX vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SENT is a Long-Short fund tracking the Actively Managed. QPX is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.09%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for SENT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

QPX vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QPX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 6.26%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 32.34%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -2.96%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF	11.10%	24.12%	17.28%	44.63%	-30.90%	17.24%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and SENT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.59

The correlation between QPX and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QPX vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QPX	SENT
Technology	49.8%	26.2%
Consumer Cyclical	25.6%	10.1%
Communication Services	14.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	6.4%	-
Industrials	1.0%	14.6%
Financial Services	0.9%	6.1%
Healthcare	0.6%	24.8%
Energy	0.3%	10.3%
Basic Materials	0.3%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	3.1%
Utilities	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QPX vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX

QPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QPX	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QPX	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	-0.36	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	-0.25	+0.92

Drawdowns

QPX vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QPX	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-30.34%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	0.00%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.89%	-15.83%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-30.34%	-4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-27.23%	+26.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.07%	-20.90%	+12.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	0.00%	+2.90%

Volatility

QPX vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that QPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QPX	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	0.00%	+4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.00%	0.00%	+11.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	0.00%	+13.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	12.65%	+7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	13.31%	+6.68%

QPX vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

QPX vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QPX nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QPX and SENT in my portfolio?

QPX and SENT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QPX or SENT?

QPX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, QPX or SENT?

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.09% vs -4.51% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QPX or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.09% return vs -4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QPX or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QPX or SENT?

QPX and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QPX and SENT?

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SENT is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.01% for SENT.