SENT vs. MJUS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS).

SENT and MJUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SENT is a passively managed fund by AdvisorShares that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021. MJUS is an actively managed fund by ETFMG. It was launched on May 12, 2021.

Performance

SENT vs. MJUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SENT vs. MJUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	7.22%
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -2.90%
• 5Y*: -4.28%
• 10Y*: —

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. MJUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MJUS's 0.75% expense ratio.

SENT

AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF

MJUS

ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF

Return for Risk

SENT vs. MJUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	MJUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between SENT and MJUS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SENT vs. MJUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENT nor MJUS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	MJUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.69%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SENT	MJUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.54%	—	—