QPX vs. DWUS
QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) and DWUS (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while DWUS is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QPX returned 13.56%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for DWUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QPX charges 1.46%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for DWUS.
Performance
QPX vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than DWUS's 15.11% return.
QPX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 11.61%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 34.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- —
DWUS
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 14.84%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
QPX vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 11.61% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 15.11% | 12.75% | 20.26% | 20.62% | -17.89% | 20.21% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and DWUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QPX and DWUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
QPX vs. DWUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QPX
DWUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
QPX
DWUS
Consumer Cyclical
QPX
DWUS
Communication Services
QPX
DWUS
Real Estate
QPX
DWUS
Industrials
QPX
DWUS
Financial Services
QPX
DWUS
Healthcare
QPX
DWUS
Energy
QPX
DWUS
Basic Materials
QPX
DWUS
Consumer Defensive
QPX
DWUS
Utilities
QPX
DWUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
DWUS
QPX vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 1.58 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 2.19 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.06 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.01 | 7.80 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.58 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.65 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than DWUS's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DWUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -30.47% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -11.98% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -19.63% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -26.45% | -8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | -6.86% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 3.16% | -0.26% |
Volatility
QPX vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.18%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | DWUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 4.92% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.98% | 12.48% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 15.46% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 18.82% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 21.89% | -1.89% |
QPX vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPX vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWUS AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.18% | 0.29% | 0.89% | 0.35% | 0.08% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPX and DWUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWUS has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to QPX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DWUS's -30.47%.
On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.56% vs 12.14% for DWUS. On fees, DWUS is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DWUS is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
DWUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DWUS is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.17% for DWUS.
QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QPX and DWUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer