PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPX vs. DWUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPX vs. DWUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly lower than DWUS's 15.11% return.


QPX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.17%
YTD
11.61%
6M
12.59%
1Y
34.26%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*

DWUS

1D
1.49%
1M
9.16%
YTD
15.11%
6M
14.84%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPX vs. DWUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
11.61%24.12%17.28%44.63%-30.90%22.29%0.38%
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
15.11%12.75%20.26%20.62%-17.89%20.21%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QPX and DWUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020

0.86

The correlation between QPX and DWUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QPX vs. DWUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPX
DWUS

Technology

49.8%
45.9%

Consumer Cyclical

25.6%
10.8%

Communication Services

14.9%
13.4%

Real Estate

6.4%
0.9%

Industrials

1.0%
5.3%

Financial Services

0.9%
5.8%

Healthcare

0.6%
6.4%

Energy

0.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
6.3%

Utilities

0.1%
1.6%

Technology

QPX
49.8%
DWUS
45.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QPX
25.6%
DWUS
10.8%

Communication Services

QPX
14.9%
DWUS
13.4%

Real Estate

QPX
6.4%
DWUS
0.9%

Industrials

QPX
1.0%
DWUS
5.3%

Financial Services

QPX
0.9%
DWUS
5.8%

Healthcare

QPX
0.6%
DWUS
6.4%

Energy

QPX
0.3%
DWUS
2.3%

Basic Materials

QPX
0.3%
DWUS
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

QPX
0.2%
DWUS
6.3%

Utilities

QPX
0.1%
DWUS
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPX vs. DWUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPX
QPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DWUS
DWUS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPX vs. DWUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QPXDWUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.47

1.58

+0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

2.19

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.06

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.01

7.80

+4.21

QPX vs. DWUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the DWUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QPX and DWUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPXDWUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.58

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.71

-0.03

Drawdowns

QPX vs. DWUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than DWUS's maximum drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and DWUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPXDWUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-30.47%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-11.98%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-19.63%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.74%

-26.45%

-8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-6.86%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.16%

-0.26%

Volatility

QPX vs. DWUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 4.18%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF (DWUS) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPXDWUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

4.92%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

12.48%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

15.46%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

18.82%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

21.89%

-1.89%

QPX vs. DWUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DWUS's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPX vs. DWUS - Dividend Comparison

QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DWUS
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM US Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.18%0.29%0.89%0.35%0.08%
QPX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QPX and DWUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWUS has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to QPX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QPX dropped -34.74% vs DWUS's -30.47%.

On 5-year performance, QPX leads with 13.56% vs 12.14% for DWUS. On fees, DWUS is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, QPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QPX has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DWUS is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.

DWUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.

QPX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DWUS is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for QPX and 1.17% for DWUS.

QPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPX and DWUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer