QPX vs. STLG
Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG).
QPX and STLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QPX is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Dec 28, 2020. STLG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell US Large Cap Factors Growth Style Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2020.
Performance
QPX vs. STLG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QPX vs. STLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | -4.88% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | 0.38% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | -6.01% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 0.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly higher than STLG's -6.01% return.
QPX
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
STLG
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -2.39%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QPX vs. STLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QPX vs. STLG — Risk / Return Rank
QPX
STLG
QPX vs. STLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QPX | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.62 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 1.87 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 6.91 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPX | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.70 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.71 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between QPX and STLG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QPX vs. STLG - Dividend Comparison
QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STLG iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
QPX vs. STLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPX drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than STLG's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPX and STLG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPX | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -31.34% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.02% | -13.69% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.74% | -30.61% | -4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -10.35% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -7.53% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.71% | -0.69% |
Volatility
QPX vs. STLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) is 5.31%, while iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that QPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QPX | STLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 7.52% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 14.44% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.24% | 24.39% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 21.86% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 24.02% | -3.87% |